The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Incidence of Peripheral Nerve Injury in Extremity Trauma
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence of peripheral nerve injury within 90 days of a limb trauma diagnosis in patients who have presented to the hospital or outpatient clinic. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective, descriptive study that uses the 1998 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (The MEDSTAT Group) to track peripheral nerve injuries in extremity trauma. We selected our sample by using ICD9 codes for limb trauma during the first 9 mos of 1998. Nerve injuries within 90 days after limb trauma were the main outcome measure. Finally, we report how the rates of trauma and accompanying nerve injuries were contrasted by gender and age group, using univariate and bivariate statistics. All data analyses were conducted using Stata 9.0 statistical software. RESULTS: Out of 16 million insureds in the database, 220,593 (1.4%) were diagnosed with limb trauma. Eighty-three percent of the patients were less than 55 yrs old, and 50% were male. The total incidence of nerve injuries within 90 days of upper- or lower-limb trauma was 1.64%. The type of extremity trauma with the highest incidence of nerve injury within 90 days of the diagnosis was a crush injury at 1.9%. Approximately 50% of our sample was selected because of a dislocation, which had an associated nerve injury prevalence of 1.46%. CONCLUSIONS: When looking at the population sampled, rates for peripheral nerve injury in people incurring limb trauma are low. Crush injuries seem to have the highest rate of associated nerve injury. Further studies are needed to observe outcomes for people with nerve damage after trauma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noble, J., Munro, C. A., Prasad, V. S. S. V., & Midha, R. (1998) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-199807000-00025 · Cited by 995
Cited by
Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction after Injury: A Review of Clinical and Experimental Therapies
Grinsell, D., & Keating, C. P. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/698256 · Cited by 1,048
Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration
Gu, X., Ding, F., & Williams, D. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064 · Cited by 630
Peripheral nerve repair with cultured schwann cells: getting closer to the clinics
Rodrigues, M. C. O., Rodrigues, A. A., Glover, L. E., Voltarelli, J., & Borlongan, C. V. (2012) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1100/2012/413091 · Cited by 75
Optogenetically enhanced axon regeneration: motor versus sensory neuron‐specific stimulation
Ward, P. J., Clanton, S. L., & English, A. W. (2018) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13836 · Cited by 38
Effective decellularization of human nerve matrix for regenerative medicine with a novel protocol
Nieto-Nicolau, N., López-Chicón, P., Fariñas, O., Bolívar, S., Udina, E., Navarro, X., Casaroli-Marano, R., & Vilarrodona, A. (2021) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-020-03317-3 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, C. A., Braza, D., Rice, J. B., & Dillingham, T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 381-385
- ISSN
- 0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992137840
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Incidence of Peripheral Nerve Injury in Extremity Trauma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/phm.0b013e31815e6370
- The paper
- Taylor, C. A., Braza, D., Rice, J. B., & Dillingham, T. (2008). The Incidence of Peripheral Nerve Injury in Extremity Trauma. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0b013e31815e6370
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.