Cited by 166Electronic Health Records SystemsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The Role of Informatics in Promoting Patient-Centered Care

Open access
Snyder, Claire F., Wu, Albert W., Miller, Robert S., Jensen, Roxanne E., Bantug, Elissa T., Wolff, Antonio C.·2011·The Cancer Journal

Abstract

Patient-centered care is an important aspect of high-quality care. Health informatics, particularly advances in technology, has the potential to facilitate, or detract from, patient-centered cancer care. Informatics can provide a mechanism for patients to provide their clinician(s) with critical information and to share information with family, friends, and other patients. This information may enable patients to exert greater control over their own care. Clinicians may use information systems (e.g., electronic medical records) to coordinate care and share information with other clinicians. Patients and clinicians may use communication tools and information resources to interact with one another in new ways. Caution in using new information resources is warranted to avoid reliance on biased or inappropriate data, and clinicians may need to direct patients to appropriate information resources. Perhaps the greatest challenge for both patients and providers is identifying information that is high quality and that enhances (and does not impede) their interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ppo.0b013e318225ff89

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Institute of Medicine Crossing the Quality Chasm Washinton, DC National Academies Press 2001 25057539
  2. [54]Kearney N McCann L Norrie J Evaluation of a mobile phone-based, advanced symptom management system (ASMS) in the management of chemotherapy-related toxicity Support Care Cancer 2009 17 437 444 18953579
  3. [64]Campion EW Book Review “The Medicalization of Cyberspace” N Engl J Med 2008 359 2074
  4. [67]Interim Meeting of the House of Delegates: AMA Policy: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/meeting/professionalism-social-media.shtml:last last accessed March 30, 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snyder, C. F., Wu, A. W., Miller, R. S., Jensen, R. E., Bantug, E. T., & Wolff, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Snyder, Claire F.
Venue
The Cancer Journal
Published
2011-07
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
211-218
ISSN
1528-9117 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009630460
Cited by
166
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Cancer Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21ca134805-02)
  • National Cancer Institute (R21 CA134805, R21CA134805-01A1)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U01AR057971)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
patient-centered care, health informatics, cancer care, electronic health records, patient-clinician communication, information sharing, patient empowerment, information quality, health information sources, care coordination
MeSH terms
Health Personnel, Humans, Medical Informatics, Neoplasms, Software, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Patient-Centered Care, Internet, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review