Cited by 50Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPrimary Care and Health OutcomesSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

The experiences and needs of people seeking primary care for low-back pain in Australia

Open access
Ahern, Malene, Dean, Catherine Mary, Dear, Blake Farran, Willcock, Simon Mark, Hush, Julia Margaret·2019·PAIN Reports

Abstract

Introduction: There is a knowledge gap about the current experiences and needs of people with low back pain (LBP) seeking primary care in Australia. Objectives: The aim of this study was to understand the experiences and needs of Australians who have received treatment for LBP in primary care. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional internet survey conducted between July 2017 and September 2017. Participants were adults who had experienced an episode of LBP in the past year, had sought primary care in Australia, and were proficient in English. Outcomes were patient-reported experiences about primary care treatment, including reasons for seeking care, health care practitioners consulted, components of care received, and patients' evaluations of the importance and helpfulness of treatment. Results: A total of 426 Australians completed the survey. The response rate of survey completion was 50%. Participants reported seeking primary care for LBP not only for pain relief, but for difficulties with activities and participation with usual social roles as well as quality of life and mood. Participants consulted multiple health care practitioners and used numerous treatment modalities. Only half reported they received education and a very low proportion were aware of receiving guideline-based advice. The level of satisfaction with care was below moderate for 42% of respondents. Participants reported that they want LBP care to be more person-centred and better tailored to their needs; they also reported wanting more education, particularly about prevention of future episodes and self-management. Conclusions: The needs of people currently seeking primary care for LBP in Australia do not seem to be adequately met. Improving patients' experiences and outcomes may require better integration of health care across providers and delivery of more person-centred care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000756

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An Australian survey found that 28% of patients who had sought primary care treatment for low back pain in the preceding year consulted between four to eight different practitioners for their low back pain.

    “Results from an Australian survey of patients who had sought primary care treatment for LBP in the preceding year found that 28% of patients consulted between four to eight different practitioners for their LBP.114”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management. 2016 Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59. Accessed 4 December 2018. 27929617

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahern, M., Dean, C. M., Dear, B. F., Willcock, S. M., & Hush, J. M.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hush, Julia Margaret
Venue
PAIN Reports
Published
2019-07
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e756
ISSN
2471-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955250068
Cited by
50
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PAIN Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
low back pain, primary care, patient experience, patient needs, patient satisfaction, person-centred care, self-management education, integrated care, quality of life, activities of daily living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review