The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous reports on the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids have not described clear algorithms for multimodal therapies. This article presents an evidence-based review of previous articles and proposes algorithms for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids. METHODS: The methodologic quality of the clinical trials was evaluated, and the baseline characteristics of the patients and the interventions that were applied and their outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Important factors that promote hypertrophic scar/keloid development include mechanical forces on the wound, wound infection, and foreign body reactions. For keloids, the treatment method that should be used depends on whether scar contractures (especially joint contractures) are present and whether the keloids are small and single, or large and multiple. Small and single keloids can be treated radically by surgery with adjuvant therapy (which includes radiation or corticosteroid injections) or by nonsurgical monotherapy (which includes corticosteroid injections, cryotherapy, laser, and antitumor/immunosuppressive agents such as 5-fluorouracil). Large and multiple keloids are difficult to treat radically and are currently only treatable by multimodal therapies that aim to relieve symptoms. After a sequence of treatments, long-term follow-up is recommended. Conservative therapies, which include gel sheeting, taping fixation, compression therapy, external and internal agents, and makeup (camouflage) therapy, should be administered on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the number of randomized controlled trials over the past decade has greatly improved scar management, although these studies suffer from various limitations. The hypertrophic scar/keloid treatment algorithms that are currently available are likely to be significantly improved by future high-quality clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in skin grafting and treatment of cutaneous wounds
Sun, B. K., Siprashvili, Z., & Khavari, P. A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1253836 · Cited by 972
Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: Pathophysiology, Classification, and Treatment
Berman, B., Maderal, A., & Raphael, B. (2017) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000000819 · Cited by 687
Hsu, C.-K., Tzeng, S.-Y., Yang, C.-C., Lee, J. Y.-Y., Huang, L. L.-H., Chen, W.-R., Hughes, M., Chen, Y.-W., Liao, Y.-K., & Tseng, S.-H. (2015) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.6.000390 · Cited by 45
Opatha, S. A. T., Chutoprapat, R., Khankaew, P., Titapiwatanakun, V., Ruksiriwanich, W., & Boonpisuttinant, K. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123738 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogawa, R.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 557-568
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989963286
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181c82dd5
- The paper
- Ogawa, R. (2010). The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181c82dd5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.