The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite its benefits in body image, self-esteem, sexuality, and quality of life, historically fewer than 25 percent of patients undergo immediate breast reconstruction. After passage of the Women Health and Cancer Rights Act, studies failed to demonstrate changes in reconstructive rates. A recent single-year report suggests significant shifts in U.S. breast reconstruction patterns. The authors' goal was to assess long-term trends in rates and types of immediate reconstruction. METHODS: A serial cross-sectional study of immediate breast reconstruction trends was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1998 to 2008. Data on mastectomies, reconstructive method (autologous/implant), and sociodemographic/hospital predictors were obtained. RESULTS: Immediate breast reconstruction rates increased on average 5 percent per year, from 20.8 percent to 37.8 percent (p < 0.01). Autologous reconstruction rates were unchanged. Implant use increased by an average of 11 percent per year (p < 0.01), surpassing autologous methods as the leading reconstructive modality after 2002. The strongest predictors of implant use were procedures performed after 2002, bilateral mastectomies, patients operated on in Midwest/West regions, and Medicare recipients. In contrast to bilateral mastectomies, which increased by 17 percent per year (p < 0.01), unilateral mastectomies decreased by 2 percent per year (p < 0.01). Bilateral mastectomy defects had significantly higher reconstruction rates than unilateral counterparts (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The significant rise in immediate reconstruction rates in the United States correlates closely to a 203 percent expansion in implant use. Although the reason for the increase in implant use is multifactorial, changes in mastectomy patterns, such as increased use of bilateral mastectomies, are one important contributor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers
FORD, D. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91578-4 · Cited by 1,850
Yueh, J. H., Slavin, S. A., Adesiyun, T., Nyame, T. T., Gautam, S., Morris, D. J., Tobias, A. M., & Lee, B. T. (2010) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181cb6351 · Cited by 390
Hu, E. S., Pusic, A. L., Waljee, J. F., Kuhn, L., Hawley, S. T., Wilkins, E., & Alderman, A. K. (2009) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181ab10b2 · Cited by 302
Self-citation
Cited by
Current Trends in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
Panchal, H., & Matros, E. (2017) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003941 · Cited by 462
Self-citationCemal, Y., Albornoz, C. R., Disa, J. J., McCarthy, C. M., Mehrara, B. J., Pusic, A. L., Cordeiro, P. G., & Matros, E. (2013) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31827cf576 · Cited by 284
Self-citationParmaksiz, M., Dogan, A., Odabas, S., Elçin, A. E., & Elçin, Y. M. (2016) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-6041/11/2/022003 · Cited by 268
Lohmander, F., Lagergren, J., Roy, P. G., Johansson, H., Brandberg, Y., Eriksen, C., & Frisell, J. (2019) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003054 · Cited by 73
Kamel, G. N., Mehta, K., Nash, D., Jacobson, J., Berk, R., Rizzo, A. M., Greige, N., Benacquista, T., Garfein, E. S., & Weichman, K. E. (2019) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000006201 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Albornoz, C. R., Bach, P. B., Mehrara, B. J., Disa, J. J., Pusic, A. L., McCarthy, C. M., Cordeiro, P. G., & Matros, E.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-23
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321114481
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 46.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182729cde
- The paper
- Albornoz, C. R., Bach, P. B., Mehrara, B. J., Disa, J. J., Pusic, A. L., McCarthy, C. M., Cordeiro, P. G., & Matros, E. (2013). A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182729cde
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.