Cited by 8Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare Quality and ManagementHealth Policy Implementation Science

Who Applies an Intervention to Influence Cultural Attributes in a Quality Improvement Collaborative?

Hsu, Yea-Jen, Marsteller, Jill A.·2020·Journal of Patient Safety

Abstract

Objectives: Organizational culture change has been recognized as one of the promising ways to reduce error and increase safety. However, it is still unclear what factors support health care teams implementing interventions aimed to influence the cultural attributes that bolster continuous quality improvement. This study aimed to identify factors related to teams' adoption of the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP), an approach to improving patient safety culture among intensive care units (ICUs) participating in a bloodstream infection reduction collaborative. Methods: We analyzed data from the 103 ICUs participating in the Keystone ICU project. We conducted logistic regressions to assess baseline factors associated with ICU teams’ use of CUSP. Predictors included safety climate scales (teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perceptions of management, and working conditions) as measured by the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, central line-associated bloodstream infection rates, bloodstream infection prevention intervention phase, ICU type, hospital bed size, and hospital teaching status. Results: Intensive care units with lower perceived safety climate, greater stress recognition, higher perceptions of management, and better working conditions were more likely to adopt CUSP. Intensive care units that implemented the infection prevention interventions late were less likely to adopt CUSP. Mixed ICUs and ICUs in large hospitals were also less likely to use CUSP. Conclusions: Staff-perceived safety climate, ICU type, and hospital size were related to ICUs’ implementation of CUSP. Better baseline safety climate or lower perceived organizational support reduced uptake. The findings can help hospital leaders and collaborative experts identify units that are less likely to implement cultural interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pts.0000000000000223

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teamwork climate was not significantly associated with adoption of a comprehensive safety program in intensive care units.

    “The first study found that teamwork climate (i.e., perceived quality of collaboration between personnel) was not significantly associated with adoption of a comprehensive safety program in intensive care units, although there were associations between adoption and organizational constructs (e.g., lower safety climate, more management support) [59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, Y.-J., & Marsteller, J. A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Marsteller, Jill A.
Venue
Journal of Patient Safety
Published
2015-07-09
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 1549-8417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-8425
OpenAlex
W2321463437
Cited by
8
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Patient Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program, patient safety culture, organizational culture change, intensive care unit, central line-associated bloodstream infection, infection prevention interventions, safety climate, intervention adoption, teamwork climate, working conditions, hospital size
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Safety Management, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review