Cited by 143HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Trends in condom use among MSM in the United States: the role of antiretroviral therapy and seroadaptive strategies

Open access
Paz-Bailey, Gabriela, Mendoza, Maria C.B., Finlayson, Teresa, Wejnert, Cyprian, Le, Binh, Rose, Charles, Raymond, Henry Fisher, Prejean, Joseph·2016·AIDS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate changes in condomless anal sex at last sex among men who have sex with men (MSM) and assess if these changes are associated with the adoption of serosorting and biomedical prevention. DESIGN: The National HIV Behavioral Surveillance is a crosssectional survey done in up to 21 cities in 2005, 2008, 2011 and 2014. METHODS: MSM were recruited through venue-based sampling. Among men reporting at least one male partner, we evaluated changes in condomless anal sex at last sex with a partner with (1) HIV-concordant (proxy for serosorting) or (2) HIV-discordant (discordant/unknown) status. We hypothesized that if concordant condomless sex was increasing while discordant was stable/declining, the increases could be driven by more men attempting to serosort. We used generalized estimating equations assuming a Poisson distribution and robust variance estimator to explore whether temporal changes in the outcomes varied by selected characteristics. We also assessed changes in condomless anal sex by antiretroviral therapy (ART) use among HIV-positive MSM. RESULTS: Among 5371 HIV-positive MSM, there were increases in concordant (19% in 2005 to 25% in 2014, P < 0.001) and discordant condomless sex (15 to 19%, P < 0.001). The increases were not different by ART use. Among 30 547 HIV-negative MSM, concordant (21 to 27%, P < 0.001) and discordant condomless sex (8 to 13%, P < 0.001) increased. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that condom use decreased among MSM and that the trends are not explained by serosorting or ART. Promotion of condoms and increased access to preexposure prophylaxis are vital to ensure that the benefits of ART in reducing transmission of HIV are not undermined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qad.0000000000001139

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MSM might be at increased risk for HIV and other STIs because of their sexual network or behavioral or biologic factors, including number of concurrent partners, condomless sex, anal sex, or substance use.

    “MSM might be at increased risk for HIV and other STIs because of their sexual network or behavioral or biologic factors, including number of concurrent partners, condomless sex, anal sex, or substance use (180–182).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [181]

    The Introduction and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) describe HIV transmission risk associated with condomless anal sex among MSM, including differences in risk by sexual position. The cited paper does not address the claim’s other specified factors—sexual networks, concurrent partners, or substance use—or establish the broader claim about other STIs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Smith D Herbst JH Zhang X Rose C Condom efficacy by consistency of use among MSM: US Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections Atlanta, Georgia 2012
  2. [23]Rosenberg ES Grey JA Paz-Bailey G Hall I Lansky AM Estimating the number and characteristics of HIV transmissions in serodiscordant male–male partnerships in the United States Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections Seattle, Washington 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paz-Bailey, G., Mendoza, M. C. B., Finlayson, T., Wejnert, C., Le, B., Rose, C., Raymond, H. F., & Prejean, J.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
AIDS
Published
2016-07-31
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
1985-1990
ISSN
0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346128149
Cited by
143
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 6
FWCI
18.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
condomless anal sex, men who have sex with men, serosorting, antiretroviral therapy, HIV prevention, pre-exposure prophylaxis, HIV transmission, HIV-negative men, HIV-positive men
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, United States, HIV Infections, Condoms, Homosexuality, Male, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Anti-Retroviral Agents, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review