Cited by 118HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Effectiveness of the WHO/UNICEF guidelines on infant feeding for HIV-positive women: results from a prospective cohort study in South Africa

Doherty, Tanya, Chopra, Mickey, Jackson, Debra, Goga, Ameena, Colvin, Mark, Persson, Lars-Ake·2007·AIDS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF recommend that HIV-positive women should avoid all breastfeeding only if replacement feeding is acceptable, feasible, affordable, sustainable and safe. Little is known about the effectiveness of the implementation of these guidelines in developing country settings. OBJECTIVE: To identify criteria to guide appropriate infant-feeding choices and to assess the effect of inappropriate choices on infant HIV-free survival. METHOD: Prospective cohort study of 635 HIV-positive mother-infant pairs across three sites in South Africa to assess mother to child transmission of HIV. Semistructured questionnaires were used during home visits between the antenatal period and 36 weeks after delivery to collect data concerning appropriateness of infant feeding choices based on the WHO/UNICEF recommendations. RESULTS: Three criteria were found to be associated with improved infant HIV-free survival amongst women choosing to formula feed: piped water; electricity, gas or paraffin for fuel; and disclosing HIV status. Using these criteria as a measure of appropriateness of choice: 95 of 311 women who met the criteria (30.5%) chose to breastfeed and 195 of 289 women who did not meet the criteria (67.4%) chose to formula feed. Infants of women who chose to formula feed without fulfilling these three criteria had the highest risk of HIV transmission/death (hazard ratio, 3.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-8.89). CONCLUSIONS: Within operational settings, the WHO/UNICEF guidelines were not being implemented effectively, leading to inappropriate infant-feeding choices and consequent lower infant HIV-free survival. Counselling of mothers should include an assessment of individual and environmental criteria to support appropriate infant-feeding choices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qad.0b013e32827b1462

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doherty, T., Chopra, M., Jackson, D., Goga, A., Colvin, M., & Persson, L.-A.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Centre for AIDS Development, Research and Evaluation (ZA)
Corresponding author
Doherty, Tanya
Venue
AIDS
Published
2007-08-20
Volume
21
Issue
13
Pages
1791-1797
ISSN
0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993806523
Cited by
118
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • UNICEF
  • Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
infant feeding, HIV-positive mothers, replacement feeding, breastfeeding, mother-to-child transmission of HIV, guideline implementation, piped water, household fuel, HIV status disclosure, maternal counseling, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bottle Feeding, Breast Feeding, Choice Behavior, Developing Countries, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Infant, Newborn, Socioeconomic Factors, South Africa, HIV Infections, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review