Cited by 290Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Adjunctive interferon-γ immunotherapy for the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Jarvis, Joseph N., Meintjes, Graeme, Rebe, Kevin, Williams, Gertrude Ntombomzi, Bicanic, Tihana, Williams, Anthony, Schutz, Charlotte, Bekker, Linda-Gail +2 more·2012·AIDS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interferon-gamma (IFNγ) is of key importance in the immune response to Cryptococcus neoformans. Mortality related to cryptococcal meningitis remains high, and novel treatment strategies are needed. We performed a randomized controlled trial to determine whether addition of IFNγ to standard therapy increased the rate of clearance of cryptococcal infection in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. METHODS: Patients were randomized to amphotericin B 1 mg/kg per day and 5FC 100 mg/kg per day for 2 weeks (standard therapy), standard therapy and IFNγ1b 100 μg days 1 and 3 (IFNγ two doses), or standard therapy and IFNγ1b 100 μg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 and 12 (IFNγ six doses). Primary outcome was rate of clearance of cryptococcus from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (early fungicidal activity, EFA) calculated from serial quantitative cultures, previously shown to be independently associated with survival. RESULTS: Rate of fungal clearance was significantly faster in IFNγ containing groups than with standard treatment. Mean EFA [log colony forming unit (CFU)/ml per day] was -0.49 with standard treatment, -0.64 with IFNγ two doses, and -0.64 with IFNγ six doses. Difference in EFA was -0.15 [confidence interval (95% CI) -0.02 to -0.27, P=0.02] between standard treatment and IFNγ two doses, and -0.15 (95% CI -0.05 to -0.26, P=0.006) between standard treatment and IFNγ six doses. Mortality was 16% (14/88) at 2 weeks and 31% (27/87) at 10 weeks, with no significant difference between groups. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Addition of short-course IFNγ to standard treatment significantly increased the rate of clearance of cryptococcal infection from the CSF, and was not associated with any increase in adverse events. Two doses of IFNγ are as effective as six doses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qad.0b013e3283536a93

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Addition of adjuvant IFNγ to the standard of care enhanced fungal clearance from the cerebrospinal fluid with no reported increase in adverse effects in two phase II clinical trials.

    “Two phase II clinical trials investigated the safety and efficacy of administering exogenous, recombinant IFNγ as a cryptococcal therapy and found that addition of adjuvant IFNγ to the standard of care enhanced fungal clearance from the cerebrospinal fluid with no reported increase in adverse effects124,125.”
  • A strong IFNγ response is indicative of a good prognosis in patients with cryptococcosis.

    “A strong IFNγ response is indicative of a good prognosis in patients with cryptococcosis123,124.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 290

Authors
Jarvis, J. N., Meintjes, G., Rebe, K., Williams, G. N., Bicanic, T., Williams, A., Schutz, C., Bekker, L.-G., Wood, R., & Harrison, T. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Anova Health Institute (ZA)
  • GF Jooste Hospital (ZA)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jarvis, Joseph N.
Venue
AIDS
Published
2012-06-01
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1105-1113
ISSN
0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054253853
Cited by
290
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 10
FWCI
20.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (/WT081794, /WT081667, 081794, 84323)
  • Fogarty International Center (U2RTW007373, U2RTW007370)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
interferon-gamma, HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis, Cryptococcus neoformans, amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, mortality, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Antiviral Agents, Cryptococcus neoformans, Deoxycholic Acid, Drug Combinations, Female, Flucytosine, Humans, Interferon-gamma, Male, HIV Infections, Treatment Outcome, Meningitis, Cryptococcal, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review