The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli: changing epidemiology and clinical impact
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses the recent findings (July 2008-January 2010) on extended-spectrum [beta]-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, mainly focussed on the epidemiology and clinical impact of infections owing to this pathogen. RECENT FINDINGS: CTX-M-producing E. coli, mainly the CTX-M-15 producers, has emerged and disseminated worldwide as an important cause of both nosocomial and community-onset infections. The clonal spread of the ST131 epidemic E. coli strain is linked not only to the CTX-M-15 pandemia but also to other ESBLs types. The most commonly reported risk factors for community-onset ESBL-producing E. coli infections are contact with healthcare centres, recent use of antimicrobial agents, and presence of comorbidities. But infections owing to ESBL-producing E. coli in patients without obvious risk factors can occur, probably related to the increase of healthy carriers colonized with this pathogen. The main significant predictor of mortality caused by ESBL-producing E. coli is inadequate initial antimicrobial therapy. Alternatives of treatment of severe ESBL-producing E. coli infections included carbapenems, amikacin, tigecycline, and [beta]-lactam/[beta]-lactamase inhibitor combinations; with some of them enough clinical evidence is lacking (tigecycline, [beta]-lactam/[beta]-lactamase inhibitor combinations). For urinary tract infections, fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin could be useful. SUMMARY: The worldwide emergence of multiresistant ESBL-producing E. coli raises key therapeutic problems; interventions addressed to their quick detection and early appropriate antibiotic treatment and prevention are urgently needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peirano, G., & Pitout, J. D. D. (2010) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.003 · Cited by 443
Cited by
Llor, C., & Bjerrum, L. (2014) · Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety · doi:10.1177/2042098614554919 · Cited by 2,079
Multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infections: a review
Mazzariol, A., Bazaj, A., & Cornaglia, G. (2017) · Journal of Chemotherapy · doi:10.1080/1120009x.2017.1380395 · Cited by 325
Ayres, J. S., Trinidad, N. J., & Vance, R. E. (2012) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2729 · Cited by 213
Talukdar, P. K., Rahman, M., Rahman, M., Nabi, A., Islam, Z., Hoque, M. M., Endtz, H. P., & Islam, M. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061090 · Cited by 189
Crosstalk between gut microbiota and sepsis
Niu, M., & Chen, P. (2021) · Burns & Trauma · doi:10.1093/burnst/tkab036 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Oteo, J., Pérez-Vázquez, M., & Campos, J.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 320-326
- ISSN
- 0951-7375 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975477890
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli: changing epidemiology and clinical impact. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/qco.0b013e3283398dc1
- The paper
- Oteo, J., Pérez-Vázquez, M., & Campos, J. (2010). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli: changing epidemiology and clinical impact. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.0b013e3283398dc1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.