Cited by 35Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesBreast Implant and Reconstruction

Nasal Spreader Grafts: A Comparison of Medpor to Autologous Tissue Reconstruction

Reiffel, Alyssa J., Cross, Kevin J., Spinelli, Henry M.·2011·Annals of Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Reconstruction of the damaged nasal vault is challenging. Limited available autologous tissue has lead surgeons to pursue alloplastic alternatives. A retrospective review comparing 18 patients who underwent secondary rhinoplasty with internal nasal valve reconstruction with spreader graft (SG) implants using either autologous tissue or high-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) was performed. All underwent bilateral SG reconstruction of the internal nasal valve with Medpor (10 cases) or autologous cartilage (8 cases). Mean follow-up was 26 months for the autologous group and 29 months for the Medpor group. Functional performance and aesthetic results were identical. Complications were few: 1 case of unilateral infection in the Medpor group treated with partial excision, and 1 case of erythema at the auricular donor site for the autologous tissue group. For patients who have exhausted autologous tissue options or are unwilling to tolerate potential donor-site morbidity, the Medpor SG is an appropriate option that allows for excellent aesthetic and functional results that remains stable over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181d3ef8e

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reiffel, A. J., Cross, K. J., & Spinelli, H. M.
Affiliations
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Reiffel, Alyssa J.
Venue
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
2011-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
24-28
ISSN
0148-7043 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015866891
Cited by
35
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Keywords
spreader grafts, secondary rhinoplasty, Medpor, porous polyethylene implants, autologous cartilage, donor site morbidity, postoperative complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Biocompatible Materials, Cartilage, Esthetics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Polyethylenes, Rhinoplasty, Nasal Obstruction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review