The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of Drill in Otoplasty: A Technical Modification
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prominent ear is one of the most common congenital deformities in the head and neck region. More than 100 techniques have been described for correction of prominent ears in literature. Mustarde technique is one of the most widely accepted procedures of otoplasty. In our study, we used a surgical method using a drill for correction of prominent ears in combination with the Mustarde technique. Patients with only lack of antihelical fold were included the study. METHODS: Thirty patients were operated on during 2007-2010. The angle of prominent ear from the mastoid tip to the tip of the posterior surface of the auricle was measured preoperatively and postoperatively (3 months after operation) using jib and protractor. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The angulation of prominent ear was 45.2 ± 8.6 degrees preoperatively. Postoperatively, the angulation was 25.6 ± 6.3 degrees. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Fifteen patients (50%) reported that the operation was very satisfactory, 13 patients (43.4%) reported that the operation was satisfactory, and 2 patients (6.6%) reported that the operation was not satisfactory cosmetically. CONCLUSION: The described technique of otoplasty using a drill to thin the auricular cartilage is a safe and easy-to-learn procedure. In Mustarde technique, permanent sutures are used to reshape the cartilage structure in fixed position. Over time, structural strength elasticity of cartilage can weaken the force of sewing forces. Combining the technique with permanent sutures, results were satisfactory. This technique can be used to recreate the antihelical fold. We will follow the cases long term to further show more results.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sahin and Turker used cartilage thinning with a diamond drill and Mustardé sutures to achieve precise reshaping with low complication rates.
“Sahin and Turker86 used cartilage thinning with a diamond drill and Mustardé14 sutures to achieve precise reshaping with low complication rates.”
From Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review (2026) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
Otoplasty: Anterior Scoring Technique and Results in 500 Cases
Caouette‐Laberge, L., Guay, N. A., Bortoluzzi, P. A., & Belleville, C. (2000) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200002000-00004 · Cited by 100
Bauer, B. S., Song, D. H., & Aitken, M. E. (2002) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000021310.11022.4d · Cited by 45
Otoplasty: experience with a modification using a drill, and literature review
Bajaj, Y., Rokade, A., & De, P. R. (2006) · The Journal of Laryngology & Otology · doi:10.1017/s0022215106003689 · Cited by 20
Otoplasty: An Analysis of Technique Over a 33‐Year Period
Stucker, F. J., Vora, N. M., & Lian, T. (2003) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/00005537-200306000-00008 · Cited by 19
Cartilage Splitting Without Stitches
Obadia, D., Quilichini, J., Hunsinger, V., & Leyder, P. (2013) · JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.326 · Cited by 18
Thorne, C. H. M. (2008) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31817879d3 · Cited by 17
Szychta, P., & Stewart, K. J. (2013) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0b013e3182503c38 · Cited by 16
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review
Kaleeny, J. D., & Janis, J. E. (2026) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000007404
Metadata
- Authors
- Sahin, C., & Turker, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 816-819
- ISSN
- 1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2403229349
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Keywords
- otoplasty, prominent ears, Mustardé technique, auricular cartilage, patient satisfaction, congenital ear deformity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Ear Diseases, Ear, External, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Mastoid, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Treatment Outcome, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review