Cited by 12Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Three-Dimensional Calvarial Growth in Spring-Assisted Cranioplasty for Correction of Sagittal Synostosis

Open access
Rodriguez-Florez, Naiara, Borghi, Alessandro, Yauwan, Daniel D., Heuntinck, Pam, Bruse, Jan L., Tenhagen, Maik, Göktekin, Özge K., Angullia, Freida +4 more·2020·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

Spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) is a minimally invasive technique for treating sagittal synostosis in young infants. Yet, follow-up data on cranial growth in patients who have undergone SAC are lacking. This project aimed to understand how the cranial shape develops during the postoperative period, from spring insertion to removal. 3D head scans of 30 consecutive infants undergoing SAC for sagittal synostosis were acquired using a handheld scanner pre-operatively, immediately postoperatively, at follow-up and at spring removal; 3D scans of 41 age-matched control subjects were also acquired. Measurements of head length, width, height, circumference, and volume were taken for all subjects; cephalic index (CI) was calculated. Statistical shape modeling was used to compute 3D average head models of sagittal patients at the different time points. SAC was performed at a mean age of 5.2 months (range 3.3–8.0) and springs were removed 4.3 months later. CI increased significantly (P < 0.001) from pre-op (69.5% ± 2.8%) to spring removal (74.4% ± 3.9%), mainly due to the widening of head width, which became as wide as for age-matched controls; however, the CI of controls was not reached (82.3% ± 6.8%). The springs did not constrain volume changes and allowed for natural growth. Population mean shapes showed that the bony prominences seen at the sites of spring engagement settle over time, and that springs affect the overall 3D head shape of the skull. In conclusion, results reaffirmed the effectiveness of SAC as a treatment method for nonsyndromic single suture sagittal synostosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0000000000006863

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez-Florez, N., Borghi, A., Yauwan, D. D., Heuntinck, P., Bruse, J. L., Tenhagen, M., Göktekin, Ö. K., Angullia, F., Schievano, S., Dunaway, D. J., Jeelani, N. U. O., & James, G.
Affiliations
  • Craniofacial Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Vicomtech (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Borghi, Alessandro
  • Yauwan, Daniel D.
  • Tenhagen, Maik
  • Göktekin, Özge K.
  • Angullia, Freida
  • Schievano, Silvia
  • Dunaway, David J.
  • James, Greg
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2020-08-13
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
2084-2087
ISSN
  • 1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-3732
OpenAlex
W3049598917
Cited by
12
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/T005297/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N02124X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
sagittal synostosis, head shape, cephalic index, statistical shape models, infant skull, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis
MeSH terms
Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Female, Head, Humans, Infant, Male, Postoperative Period, Skull, Surgical Equipment, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review