Cited by 39Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Spring-Assisted Surgery-A Surgeon's Manual for the Manufacture and Utilization of Springs in Craniofacial Surgery

Pyle, Jeremy, Glazier, Steven, Couture, Daniel, Sanger, Claire, Gordon, Stan, David, Lisa·2009·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spring-assisted surgery has been used for the treatment of craniofacial deformities since its 1997 inception in Sweden by Dr Lauritzen (Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1998;32:331-338). Initial applications have focused on the treatment of patients with single-suture craniosynostosis. Recently, indications and applications have expanded to include patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, multiple-suture synostosis, and midface hypoplasia. The advancement of spring-assisted surgery in this country has been hindered by the need for patient-specific spring fabrication because few surgeons understand how to make the springs for each application. We will review our spring design and treatment algorithms to facilitate wider use of this innovative treatment modality. METHODS: This is a retrospective institutional review board-approved analysis of the spring design for our first 90 cases of spring-assisted surgery used to treat sagittal synostosis at the North Carolina Center for Cleft and Craniofacial Deformities. Outcome analysis was done to generate a treatment algorithm based on diagnosis, patient age, spring design, number of springs, spring force and expansion, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Ninety children with sagittal craniosynostosis (64 males, 26 females) were treated during an 8-year period (2001-2009) with spring-assisted surgery. Mean age at treatment was 4.4 months and mean age at spring removal was 8.8 months. Mean number of springs used was 2 (range, 1-3). Mean spring force used in sagittal synostosis was 5.5-9.5 (range) for the anterior spring and 5.5-9.5 (range) for the posterior spring with a mean posttreatment expansion of 6.65 cm. Analysis of the results shows that spring force and expansion required for optimal correction is dependent on the age at surgery, type of the deformity, and severity of the deformity. Specifically, the younger the child, the weaker the spring needed for surgical correction. General principles for spring application for scaphocephaly include (1) the longer the anterior posterior dimension of the skull deformity, the more likely a third spring is necessary; (2) the narrower the posterior occiput, the stronger the posterior spring required; and (3) if a postcoronal band is seen in the calvarium, a stronger anterior spring is needed. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term experience with spring-assisted surgery has facilitated the development of standardized, reproducible techniques allowing spring design modifications to optimize clinical outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0b013e3181bd2cb2

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pyle, J., Glazier, S., Couture, D., Sanger, C., Gordon, S., & David, L.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
  • Pyle, Jeremy
  • Gordon, Stan
  • David, Lisa
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2009-11
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
1962-1968
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093440441
Cited by
39
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
craniosynostosis, sagittal synostosis, spring design, spring force, cranial expansion, scaphocephaly, syndromic craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, treatment algorithm, pediatric craniofacial surgery, age at surgery, postoperative outcomes
MeSH terms
Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Retrospective Studies, Stress, Mechanical, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review