The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Complications After Curative Resection for Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to elucidate the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BACKGROUND: The relation between postoperative complications and long-term survival after curative surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is controversial; thus, this issue should be resolved with a large-scale, well-designed study. METHODS: Clinicopathological features and survival of 580 consecutive patients who received curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were investigated according to the development of postoperative pulmonary complications and anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates of patients with pStage 0, I, and II disease with postoperative complications (n = 116) were significantly poorer than those of patients without postoperative complications (n = 288) (overall 69.6% vs 46.9%, P < 0.0001; disease-specific; 76.7% vs 58.9%, P < 0.0022), whereas no differences were found in patients with pStage III and IV disease (n = 176). In the univariate and multivariate analyses for disease-specific survival, pT3, pT4, pN positivity, and development of postoperative complications were significant prognostic factors in all patients. Also, when the analysis was limited to the pStage 0, I, and II patients, development of postoperative complications, and pT3, pT4, and pN positivity, were found to be independent poor prognostic factors in multivariate analyses (hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.41, P = 0.0476). CONCLUSIONS: The development of postoperative complications is an independent disease-specific poor prognostic factor after curative resection for patients with less-advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies suggest that postoperative pneumonia may reduce long-term survival.
“Recent studies suggest that postoperative pneumonia may even reduce long‐term survival 8, 9, 10, 11.”
From Prognostic significance of postoperative pneumonia after curative resection for patients with gastric cancer (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
Complex postoperative recovery processes such as postoperative pneumonia may inhibit the immune response to tumor cell proliferation, leading to reduced disease-specific survival.
“Complex postoperative recovery processes such as postoperative pneumonia may inhibit the immune response to tumor cell proliferation, leading to reduced disease‐specific survival 9, 10.”
From Prognostic significance of postoperative pneumonia after curative resection for patients with gastric cancer (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Reduced Death and Complication Rates After Esophageal Resection
Whooley, B. P., Law, S. Y.-K., Murthy, S. C., et al. (2001) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200103000-00006 · Cited by 383
Rizk, N. P., Bach, P. B., Schrag, D., et al. (2003) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.007 · Cited by 382
Tokunaga, M., Tanizawa, Y., Bando, E., Kawamura, T., & Terashima, M. (2012) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2720-9 · Cited by 338
Karl, R. C., Schreiber, R., Boulware, D. C., Baker, S., & Coppola, D. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200005000-00003 · Cited by 287
Krarup, P., Nordholm‐Carstensen, A., Jørgensen, L. N., et al. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a6f2fc · Cited by 280
Morita, M., Yoshida, R., Ikeda, K., et al. (2008) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.12.007 · Cited by 169
Lagarde, S. M., de Boer, J. D., ten Kate, F. J. W., et al. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31815b695e · Cited by 160
Rutegård, M., Lagergren, P., Rouvelas, I., Mason, R., & Lagergren, J. (2012) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2012.02.177 · Cited by 142
Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer
Safranek, P. M., Cubitt, J., Booth, M. I., et al. (2010) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.7231 · Cited by 105
Poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients with postoperative complications
Hirai, T., Yamashita, Y., Mukaida, H., Kuwahara, M., Inoue, H., & Toge, T. (1998) · Surgery Today · doi:10.1007/s005950050187 · Cited by 92
The Influence of Technical Complications on Postoperative Outcome and Survival After Esophagectomy
Ferri, L. E., Law, S. Y.-K., Wong, K., Kwok, K., & Wong, J. (2006) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/aso.2006.04.040 · Cited by 82
Olsén, M. F., Wennberg, E., Johnsson, E., Josefson, K., Lönroth, H., & Lundell, L. R. (2002) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02207.x · Cited by 78
Ancona, E., Cagol, M., Epifani, M., et al. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.017 · Cited by 76
Takesue, T., Takeuchi, H., Ogura, M., Fukuda, K., Nakamura, R., Takahashi, T., Wada, N., Kawakubo, H., & Kitagawa, Y. (2015) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4767-x · Cited by 67
Current management of esophageal cancer
Law, S. Y.-K., & Wong, J. W. (2005) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2004.06.007 · Cited by 57
Respiratory complications after oesophagectomy for cancer do not affect disease-free survival
D'Annoville, T., D’Journo, X. B., Trousse, D. S., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs080 · Cited by 55
Xia, B. T., Rosato, E. L., Chojnacki, K. A., et al. (2012) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1823-6 · Cited by 53
Morita, M., Nakanoko, T., Kubo, N., et al. (2011) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1654-y · Cited by 40
Prognostic factors in patients with submucosal carcinoma of the oesophagus
Watanabe, M., Kuwano, H., Araki, K., et al. (2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1288 · Cited by 39
Morita, M., Ikeda, K., Sugiyama, M., et al. (2009) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.08.013 · Cited by 32
Self-citationMultimodal Treatment Strategy for Clinical T3 Thoracic Esophageal Cancer
Saeki, H., Morita, M., Tsuda, Y., et al. (2013) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3192-2 · Cited by 22
Self-citationZhang, L., Wang, N., Zhou, S., et al. (2013) · World Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1186/1477-7819-11-84 · Cited by 9
Saeki, H., Morita, M., Harada, N., et al. (2010) · Surgery Today · doi:10.1007/s00595-010-4296-y · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tu, R., Lin, J., Li, P., Xie, J., Wang, J., Lu, J., Chen, Q., Cao, L., Lin, M., Zheng, C., et al. (2017) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.1163 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Saeki, H., Tsutsumi, S., Tajiri, H., Yukaya, T., Tsutsumi, R., Nishimura, S., Nakaji, Y., Kudou, K., Akiyama, S., Kasagi, Y., Nakanishi, R., Nakashima, Y., Sugiyama, M., Ohgaki, K., Sonoda, H., Oki, E., & Maehara, Y.
- Affiliations
- Kyushu University (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 265
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 527-533
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2298637064
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K10502)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal and GI Pathology
- Keywords
- esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, postoperative complications, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leakage, curative esophagectomy, prognostic factors, disease-specific survival, early esophageal cancer, lymph node metastasis, tumor stage
- MeSH terms
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Staging, Postoperative Complications, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Esophagectomy, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
