Artificial intelligence and the future of surgical robotics
Abstract
In 2016, Shademan et al reported complete in vivo, autonomous robotic anastomosis of porcine intestine using the Smart Tissue Autonomous Robot (STAR).1,2 Although conducted in a highly controlled experimental setting, STAR quantitatively outperformed human surgeons in a series of ex vivo and in vivo surgical tasks. These trials demonstrated nascent clinical viability of an autonomous soft-tissue surgical robot for the first time. Unlike conventional surgical robots which are controlled in real-time by humans and which have become commonplace in particular subspecialties, STAR was controlled by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, and received input from an array of visual and haptic sensors. Applications of AI to clinical data for diagnostic purposes have already begun to demonstrate capability approximating that of specialist physicians.3,4 Consequentially, clinical AI has received much attention from within and outside the medical community.5 The STAR trials give clinical AI a surgical context and provide a glimpse into the future, should autonomous surgical devices be further developed. Nevertheless, their development must be rationalized and, for widespread utilization, they must confer either technical or financial advantages over conventional surgical techniques. We henceforth expand upon how this may unfold. DEFINITIONS OF AUTONOMY The International Organization for Standardization (ISO 8373:2012) defines autonomy as “an ability to perform intended tasks based on c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surgical robots use AI, ML, and DL to aid surgeons in performing complex operations with greater precision and accuracy.
“Surgical robots use AI, ML, and DL to aid surgeons in performing complex operations with greater precision and accuracy [10] .”
From Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
By using advanced algorithms, robotic surgeons can assist human surgeons during complex procedures, reducing the risk of complications and improving outcomes.
“By using advanced algorithms, robotic surgeons can assist human surgeons during complex procedures, reducing the risk of complications and improving outcomes.”
From Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Robotic surgery is a field where AI and ML are revolutionizing the way operations are performed.
“Robotic surgery is a field where AI and ML are revolutionizing the way operations are performed.”
From Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review
Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023) · Cognitive Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Macnamara, B. N., Berber, I., Çavuşoğlu, M. C., Krupinski, E. A., Nallapareddy, N., Nelson, N. E., Smith, P. J., Wilson-Delfosse, A. L., & Ray, S. (2024) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-024-00572-8 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Christou, C. D., & Tsoulfas, G. (2021) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6191 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Goel, I., Bhaskar, Y., Kumar, N., Singh, S., Amanullah, M., Dhar, R., & Karmakar, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1550407 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Alwadani, F., Lone, A., Hakami, M., Moria, A., Alamer, W., Alghirash, R., Alnawah, A., & Hadadi, A. (2024) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s455260 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Panesar, S., Cagle, Y., Chander, D., Morey, J., Fernandez-Miranda, J., & Kliot, M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Panesar, Sandip
- Morey, Jose
- Fernandez-Miranda, Juan
- Kliot, Michel
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-226
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1140
- OpenAlex
- W2929026486
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, autonomous robots, soft tissue surgery, autonomy levels, master-slave robot, surgical training, cost-effectiveness, future of surgery, haptic feedback
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Forecasting, Humans, Robotic Surgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review