Cited by 37Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Telemedicine Adoption on a Multidisciplinary Bariatric Surgery Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Open access

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to show how full-time telemedicine adoption has impacted patient visit volume and attendance in a comprehensive metabolic and weight loss center. Summary Background Data: Elective surgical practices have been profoundly impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a rapid increase in the utilization of telemedicine. The abrupt initiation of audio-video telehealth visits for all providers of a multidisciplinary clinic on March 19 th 2020 provided unique circumstances to assess the impact of telemedicine. Methods: Data from the clinical booking system (new patient and follow-up visits) for all clinical provider types of the multidisciplinary metabolic center from the pre-telehealth, post-telehealth, and a 2019 comparative period were retrospectively reviewed and compared. The primary outcome is the change in patient visit volume for all clinical providers from before to after the initiation of telemedicine for both new patient, and follow-up visits. Results: There were a total of 506 visits (162 new patient visits, and 344 follow-ups) in the pre-telehealth period, versus 413 visits (77 new patient visits, and 336 follow-ups) during the post-telehealth period. After telehealth implementation, new visits for surgeons decreased by 75%. Although follow-up visits decreased by 55.06% for surgeons, there was an increase by 27.36% for advanced practitioners. When surgeons were separated from other practitioners, their follow-up visit rate decrease by 55.06%, compared to a 16.08% increase for the group of all other practitioners (P < 0.0001). Dietitians experienced higher rates of absenteeism with new patient visits (10.00% vs 31.42%, P = 0.0128), whereas bariatricians experienced a decrease in follow-up visit absenteeism (33.33% vs 0%, P = 0.0093). Conclusions: Although new patient visit volume fell across the board, follow-up visits increased for certain nonsurgical providers. This provides a template for adoption of a multidisciplinary telehealth clinic in a post-pandemic world.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0000000000004391

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Telehealth options increase attendance.

    “that telehealth options increase attendance, 59”

    From Psychological predictors of adherence to lifestyle changes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Discussion reports a slight increase in attendance for bariatric group sessions after telehealth adoption, and Results > Absenteeism reports fewer missed bariatrician follow-up visits. But the Discussion says absenteeism was otherwise relatively stable, while Table 2 shows more missed new-patient dietitian visits. The paper therefore does not support a general claim that telehealth options increase attendance; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brown, A. M., Ardila-Gatas, J., Yuan, V., Devas, N., Docimo, S., Spaniolas, K., & Pryor, A. D.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University Hospital (US)
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2020-10-19
Volume
272
Issue
6
Pages
e306-e310
ISSN
  • 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1140
OpenAlex
W3094010130
Cited by
37
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
telemedicine, bariatric surgery, COVID-19 pandemic, patient volume, multidisciplinary clinic, follow-up visits, new patient visits, dietitians, advanced practitioners
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Care Team, Retrospective Studies, Telemedicine, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review