Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Score Predicting Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Analysis of 3851 Patients

Bilimoria, Karl Y., Talamonti, Mark S., Tomlinson, James S., Stewart, Andrew K., Winchester, David P., Ko, Clifford Y., Bentrem, David J.·2008·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) have a poorly defined natural history, and a staging system is not available. The objective of this study was to identify factors predicting survival after pancreatectomy for PNETs and to establish a postresection prognostic score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the National Cancer Data Base (1985-2004), patients were identified who underwent PNET resection. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the impact of patient, tumor, treatment, and hospital factors on survival. A prognostic score based on the predictive factors from the Cox model was developed. RESULTS: Three thousand eight hundred fifty-one patients underwent resection for PNETs. Five-year overall survival was 59.3%, and the 10-year survival was 37.7%. On multivariable analysis, age, grade, distant metastases, tumor functionality, and type of resection were independent predictors of survival after resection of PNETs (P < 0.0001). Gender, race, socioeconomic status, tumor size, nodal status, margins, adjuvant chemotherapy, and hospital volume were not associated with survival. Age, grade, and distant metastases were the most significant predictors of survival and were incorporated into a PNET postresection prognostic score. The prognostic score correlated with outcomes and offered excellent survival discrimination by each of the 3 score subgroups: 76.7%, 50.9%, and 35.7% (P < 0.0001). The concordance index was 0.63 (95% CI 0.59-0.67), indicating reasonable agreement between actual outcomes and that predicted by the prognostic score. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic score can be used to predict outcomes, guide adjuvant treatment, and stratify patients for clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e31815b9cae

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Bilimoria, K. Y., Talamonti, M. S., Tomlinson, J. S., Stewart, A. K., Winchester, D. P., Ko, C. Y., & Bentrem, D. J.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2008-03
Volume
247
Issue
3
Pages
490-500
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024243895
Cited by
341
References
1
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Score Predicting Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Analysis of 3851 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31815b9cae
The paper
Bilimoria, K. Y., Talamonti, M. S., Tomlinson, J. S., Stewart, A. K., Winchester, D. P., Ko, C. Y., & Bentrem, D. J. (2008). Prognostic Score Predicting Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Analysis of 3851 Patients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31815b9cae

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.