Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 597

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum

Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Andersson, M., Rutegård, J., Sjödahl, R.·2004·Colorectal Disease

Abstract

Objective Surgical technique and peri‐operative management of rectal carcinoma have developed substantially in the last decades. Despite this, morbidity and mortality after anterior resection of the rectum are still important problems. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage in anterior resection and to assess the role of a temporary stoma and the need for urgent re‐operations in relation to anastomotic leakage. Patients and methods In a nine‐year period, from 1987 to 1995, a total of 6833 patients underwent elective anterior resection of the rectum in Sweden. A random sample of 432 of these patients was analysed (sample size 6.3%). The associations between death and 10 patient‐ and surgery‐related variables were studied by univariate and multivariate analysis. Data were obtained by review of the hospital files from all patients. Results The incidence of symptomatic clinically evident anastomotic leakage was 12% (53/432). The 30‐day mortality was 2.1% (140/6833). The rate of mortality associated with leakage was 7.5%. A temporary stoma was initially fashioned in 17% (72/432) of the patients, and 15% (11/72) with a temporary stoma had a clinical leakage, compared with 12% (42/360) without a temporary stoma, not significant. Multivariate analysis showed that low anastomosis (≤ 6 cm), pre‐operative radiation, presence of intra‐operative adverse events and male gender were independent risk factors for leakage. The risk for permanent stoma after leakage was 25%. Females with stoma leaked in 3% compared to men with stoma who leaked in 29%. The median hospital stay for patients without leakage was 10 days (range 5–61 days) and for patients with leakage 22 days (3–110 days). Conclusion In this population based study, 12% of the patients had symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Postoperative 30‐day mortality was 2.1%. Low anastomosis, pre‐operative radiation, presence of intra‐operative adverse events and male gender were independent risk factors for symptomatic anastomotic leakage in the multivariate analysis. There was no difference in the use of temporary stoma in patients with or without anastomotic leakage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 597

Metadata

Authors
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Andersson, M., Rutegård, J., & Sjödahl, R.
Venue
Colorectal Disease
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
462-469
ISSN
  • 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1318
OpenAlex
W2092060502
Cited by
597
References
2
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x
The paper
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Andersson, M., Rutegård, J., & Sjödahl, R. (2004). Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Disease. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.