Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Total Number of Resected Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Esophageal Cancer

Altorki, Nasser K., Zhou, Xi Kathy, Stiles, Brendon, Port, Jeffrey L., Paul, Subroto, Lee, Paul C., Mazumdar, Madhu·2008·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several population-based studies have shown that the total number of surgically removed lymph nodes is independently associated with overall and disease-free survival in a variety of gastrointestinal cancers. In this retrospective study, the impact of total nodal count on overall survival in esophageal cancer was examined using a single institution surgical database. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 264 patients with esophageal cancer treated by esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy between January 1988 and December 2006. The association between overall survival (the primary endpoint) and the total number of dissected lymph nodes was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: When the total number of resected nodes was examined as a categorical variable based on quartiles (category 1: < or = 16, category 2: 17-25, category 3: 26-40, category 4: > 40) there was a reduced hazard of death with increasing number of examined nodes. Compared with those in category 1, the death hazard was reduced by 34% (P = 0.08), 48% (P = 0.001), and 49% (P = 0.001), respectively, for patients in categories 2, 3, and 4. For node negative patients a significantly reduced hazard was present only when more than 40 nodes were resected (HR = 0.23, P = 0.01). For node positive patients the death hazard was significantly reduced for those in all higher categories compared with those in category 1 (HR = 0.53, 0.39, 0.49; P = 0.03, 0.001, 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: These data support the findings from population based studies in esophageal cancer and other gastrointestinal tumors, suggesting that a higher nodal count favorably influences survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e31817bbe59

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Altorki, N. K., Zhou, X. K., Stiles, B., Port, J. L., Paul, S., Lee, P. C., & Mazumdar, M.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2008-08
Volume
248
Issue
2
Pages
221-226
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061313400
Cited by
291
References
2
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Total Number of Resected Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Esophageal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31817bbe59
The paper
Altorki, N. K., Zhou, X. K., Stiles, B., Port, J. L., Paul, S., Lee, P. C., & Mazumdar, M. (2008). Total Number of Resected Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Esophageal Cancer. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31817bbe59

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.