The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Total Number of Resected Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Esophageal Cancer
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Several population-based studies have shown that the total number of surgically removed lymph nodes is independently associated with overall and disease-free survival in a variety of gastrointestinal cancers. In this retrospective study, the impact of total nodal count on overall survival in esophageal cancer was examined using a single institution surgical database. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 264 patients with esophageal cancer treated by esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy between January 1988 and December 2006. The association between overall survival (the primary endpoint) and the total number of dissected lymph nodes was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: When the total number of resected nodes was examined as a categorical variable based on quartiles (category 1: < or = 16, category 2: 17-25, category 3: 26-40, category 4: > 40) there was a reduced hazard of death with increasing number of examined nodes. Compared with those in category 1, the death hazard was reduced by 34% (P = 0.08), 48% (P = 0.001), and 49% (P = 0.001), respectively, for patients in categories 2, 3, and 4. For node negative patients a significantly reduced hazard was present only when more than 40 nodes were resected (HR = 0.23, P = 0.01). For node positive patients the death hazard was significantly reduced for those in all higher categories compared with those in category 1 (HR = 0.53, 0.39, 0.49; P = 0.03, 0.001, 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: These data support the findings from population based studies in esophageal cancer and other gastrointestinal tumors, suggesting that a higher nodal count favorably influences survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Murray, T., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2007) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43 · Cited by 7,439
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885 · cited 1×
“Proportional hazard assumption was assessed based on weighted residuals.(21) Significant covariates (P 0.”
Method
Cited by
Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery
Busweiler, L. A. D., Schouwenburg, M. G., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Kolfschoten, N. E., de Jong, P. C., Rozema, T., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., van Hillegersberg, R., Wouters, M. W. J. M., van Sandick, J. W., et al. (2017) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10486 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Altorki, N. K., Zhou, X. K., Stiles, B., Port, J. L., Paul, S., Lee, P. C., & Mazumdar, M.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-226
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061313400
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Total Number of Resected Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Esophageal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31817bbe59
- The paper
- Altorki, N. K., Zhou, X. K., Stiles, B., Port, J. L., Paul, S., Lee, P. C., & Mazumdar, M. (2008). Total Number of Resected Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Esophageal Cancer. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31817bbe59
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.