Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 695

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathophysiologic Response to Severe Burn Injury

Open access
Jeschke, Marc G., Chinkes, David L., Finnerty, Celeste C., Kulp, Gabriela, Suman, Oscar E., Norbury, William B., Branski, Ludwik K., Gauglitz, Gerd G., Mlcak, Ronald P., Herndon, David N.·2008·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve clinical outcome and to determine new treatment options, we studied the pathophysiologic response postburn in a large prospective, single center, clinical trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A severe burn injury leads to marked hypermetabolism and catabolism, which are associated with morbidity and mortality. The underlying pathophysiology and the correlations between humoral changes and organ function have not been well delineated. METHODS: Two hundred forty-two severely burned pediatric patients [>30% total body surface area (TBSA)], who received no anabolic drugs, were enrolled in this study. Demographics, clinical data, serum hormones, serum cytokine expression profile, organ function, hypermetabolism, muscle protein synthesis, incidence of wound infection sepsis, and body composition were obtained throughout acute hospital course. RESULTS: Average age was 8 +/- 0.2 years, and average burn size was 56 +/- 1% TBSA with 43 +/- 1% third-degree TBSA. All patients were markedly hypermetabolic throughout acute hospital stay and had significant muscle protein loss as demonstrated by a negative muscle protein net balance (-0.05% +/- 0.007 nmol/100 mL leg/min) and loss of lean body mass (LBM) (-4.1% +/- 1.9%); P < 0.05. Patients lost 3% +/- 1% of their bone mineral content (BMC) and 2 +/- 1% of their bone mineral density (BMD). Serum proteome analysis demonstrated profound alterations immediately postburn, which remained abnormal throughout acute hospital stay; P < 0.05. Cardiac function was compromised immediately after burn and remained abnormal up to discharge; P < 0.05. Insulin resistance appeared during the first week postburn and persisted until discharge. Patients were hyperinflammatory with marked changes in IL-8, MCP-1, and IL-6, which were associated with 2.5 +/- 0.2 infections and 17% sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: In this large prospective clinical trial, we delineated the complexity of the postburn pathophysiologic response and conclude that the postburn response is profound, occurring in a timely manner, with derangements that are greater and more protracted than previously thought.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181856241

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 695

Metadata

Authors
Jeschke, M. G., Chinkes, D. L., Finnerty, C. C., Kulp, G., Suman, O. E., Norbury, W. B., Branski, L. K., Gauglitz, G. G., Mlcak, R. P., & Herndon, D. N.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2008-09
Volume
248
Issue
3
Pages
387-401
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052230840
Cited by
695
References
6
FWCI
15.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathophysiologic Response to Severe Burn Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181856241
The paper
Jeschke, M. G., Chinkes, D. L., Finnerty, C. C., Kulp, G., Suman, O. E., Norbury, W. B., Branski, L. K., Gauglitz, G. G., Mlcak, R. P., & Herndon, D. N. (2008). Pathophysiologic Response to Severe Burn Injury. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181856241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.