The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Left-sided Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
Abstract
In Brief Objectives: To compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic left-sided pancreatectomy (LLP) with traditional open left-sided pancreatectomy (OLP) in a multicenter experience. Summary and Background Data: LLP is being performed more commonly with limited data comparing results with outcomes from OLP. Methods: Data from 8 centers were combined for all cases performed between 2002–2006. OLP and LLP cohorts were matched by age, American Society of Anesthesiologists, resected pancreas length, tumor size, and diagnosis. Multivariate analysis was performed using binary logistic regression. Results: Six hundred sixty-seven LPs were performed, with 159 (24%) attempted laparoscopically. Indications were solid lesion in 307 (46%), cystic in 295 (44%), and pancreatitis in 65 (10%) cases. Positive margins occurred in 51 (8%) cases, 335 (50%) had complications, and significant leaks occurred in 108 (16%). Conversion to OLP occurred in 20 (13%) of the LLPs. In the matched comparison, 200 OLPs were compared with 142 LLPs. There were no differences in positive margin rates (8% vs. 7%, P = 0.8), operative times (216 vs. 230 minutes, P = 0.3), or leak rates (18% vs. 11%, P = 0.1). LLP patients had lower average blood loss (357 vs. 588 mL, P < 0.01), fewer complications (40% vs. 57%, P < 0.01), and shorter hospital stays (5.9 vs. 9.0 days, P < 0.01). By MVA, LLP was an independent factor for shorter hospital stay (P < 0.01, odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.56). Conclusions: In selected patients, LLP is associated with less morbidity and shorter LOS than OLP. Pancreatic fistula rates are similar for OLP and LLP. LLP is appropriate for selected patients with left-sided pancreatic pathology. A multi-institutional study of 667 patients undergoing left pancreatectomy over 5 years was performed. Cohort-matched outcomes for open (N = 200) versus laparoscopic (N = 142) procedures were compared. No differences were seen in major complications or clinically significant fistula rates. Average hospital stay was 3 days shorter for patients undergoing laparoscopic left pancreatectomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dindo, D., Demartines, N., & Clavien, P.-A. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae · Cited by 31,378
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy in Cushing's Syndrome and Pheochromocytoma
(1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199210013271417 · Cited by 1,495
Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature
Martin, R. C. G., Brennan, M. F., & Jaques, D. P. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200206000-00007 · Cited by 621
Self-citationEarly experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors
Gagner, M., Pomp, A., & Herrera, M. F. (1996) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80054-7 · Cited by 433
Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: Results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients
MABRUT, J., FERNANDEZCRUZ, L., AZAGRA, J., BASSI, C., DELVAUX, G., WEERTS, J., FABRE, J., BOULEZ, J., BAULIEUX, J., & PEIX, J. (2005) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.02.002 · Cited by 421
Bondar, V. M., Sweeney‐Gotsch, B., Andreeff, M., Mills, G. B., & McConkey, D. J. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 234
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Palanivelu, C., Shetty, R., Jani, K. V., et al. (2006) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-006-9020-z · Cited by 121
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation
Pryor, A. D., Means, J. R., & Pappas, T. N. (2007) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9403-9 · Cited by 69
Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in patients with neuroendocrine tumours: indications and limits
Fernández‐Cruz, L., Herrera, M. F., Sáenz, A., Pantoja, J. P., Astudillo, E., & Sierra, M. (2001) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1053/beem.2001.0133 · Cited by 50
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Lebedyev, A., Zmora, O., Kuriansky, J., et al. (2004) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-003-8221-y · Cited by 45
Cited by
International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas
Tanaka, M., Fernández-del Castillo, C., Adsay, V., Chari, S., Falconi, M., Jang, J.-Y., Kimura, W., Levy, P., Pitman, M. B., Schmidt, C. M., et al. (2012) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2012.04.004 · Cited by 2,354
Self-citation250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections: Safety and Feasibility
Zureikat, A. H., Moser, A. J., Boone, B. A., Bartlett, D. L., Zenati, M., & Zeh, H. J. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a4e87c · Cited by 388
Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review
Buia, A., Stockhausen, F., & Hanisch, E. (2015) · World Journal of Methodology · doi:10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.238 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Kooby, D. A., Gillespie, T., Bentrem, D., Nakeeb, A., Schmidt, M. C., Merchant, N. B., Parikh, A. A., Martin, R. C. G., Scoggins, C. R., Ahmad, S., Kim, H. J., Park, J., Johnston, F., Strouch, M. J., Menze, A., Rymer, J., McClaine, R., Strasberg, S. M., Talamonti, M. S., Staley, C. A., McMasters, K. M., Lowy, A. M., Byrd-Sellers, J., Wood, W. C., & Hawkins, W. G.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-446
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966781863
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 14.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Left-sided Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e318185a990
- The paper
- Kooby, D. A., Gillespie, T., Bentrem, D., Nakeeb, A., Schmidt, M. C., Merchant, N. B., Parikh, A. A., Martin, R. C. G., Scoggins, C. R., Ahmad, S., Kim, H. J., Park, J., Johnston, F., Strouch, M. J., Menze, A., Rymer, J., McClaine, R., Strasberg, S. M., Talamonti, M. S., . . . Hawkins, W. G. (2008). Left-sided Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318185a990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.