The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections: Safety and Feasibility
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Computer-assisted robotic surgery allows complex resections and anastomotic reconstructions to be performed with nearly identical standards to open surgery. We applied this technology to a variety of pancreatic resections to assess the safety, feasibility, versatility, and reliability of this technology. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database of robotic pancreatic resections at a single institution between August 2008 and November 2012 was performed. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 250 consecutive robotic pancreatic resections were analyzed; pancreaticoduodenectomy (132), distal pancreatectomy (83), central pancreatectomy (13), pancreatic enucleation (10), total pancreatectomy (5), Appleby resection (4), and Frey procedure (3). Thirty-day and 90-day mortality was 0.8% and 2.0%. Rate of Clavien 3 and 4 complications was 14% and 6%. The International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula grade C fistula rate was 4%. Mean operative time for the 2 most common procedures was 529 ± 103 minutes for pancreaticoduodenectomy and 257 ± 93 minutes for distal pancreatectomy. Continuous improvement in operative times was observed over the course of the experience. Conversion to open procedure was required in 16 patients (6%) (11 with pancreaticoduodenectomy, 2 with distal pancreatectomy, 2 with central pancreatectomy, 1 with total pancreatectomy) for failure to progress (14) and bleeding (2). CONCLUSIONS: This represents to our knowledge the largest series of robotic pancreatic resections. Safety and feasibility metrics including the low incidence of conversion support the robustness of this platform and suggest no unanticipated risks inherent to this new technology. By defining these early outcome metrics, this report begins to establish a framework for comparative effectiveness studies of this platform.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dindo, D., Demartines, N., & Clavien, P.-A. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae · Cited by 31,378
Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition
Bassi, C., Dervenis, C., Butturini, G., Fingerhut, A., Yeo, C., Izbicki, J., Neoptolemos, J., Sarr, M., Traverso, W., & Buchler, M. (2005) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 · Cited by 4,277
1423 Pancreaticoduodenectomies for Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience
Winter, J. M., Cameron, J. L., Campbell, K. A., Arnold, M. A., Chang, D. C., Coleman, J., Hodgin, M. B., Sauter, P. K., Hruban, R. H., Riall, T. S., et al. (2006) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2006.08.018 · Cited by 1,489
One Thousand Consecutive Pancreaticoduodenectomies
Cameron, J. L., Riall, T. S., Coleman, J., & Belcher, K. A. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea · Cited by 1,279
DeOliveira, M. L., Winter, J. M., Schafer, M., Cunningham, S. C., Cameron, J. L., Yeo, C. J., & Clavien, P.-A. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a · Cited by 804
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations
Barkun, J. S., Aronson, J. K., Feldman, L. S., Maddern, G. J., & Strasberg, S. M. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61083-7 · Cited by 573
Robotically Assisted vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Among Women With Benign Gynecologic Disease
Wright, J. D., Ananth, C. V., Lewin, S. N., Burke, W. M., Lu, Y.-S., Neugut, A. I., Herzog, T. J., & Hershman, D. L. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.186 · Cited by 573
Diener, M. K., Seiler, C. M., Rossion, I., Kleeff, J., Glanemann, M., Butturini, G., Tomazic, A., Bruns, C. J., Busch, O. R., Farkas, S., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60237-7 · Cited by 554
Venkat, R., Edil, B. H., Schulick, R. D., Lidor, A. O., Makary, M. A., & Wolfgang, C. L. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318251ee09 · Cited by 502
Left-sided Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
Kooby, D. A., Gillespie, T., Bentrem, D., Nakeeb, A., Schmidt, M. C., Merchant, N. B., Parikh, A. A., Martin, R. C. G., Scoggins, C. R., Ahmad, S., et al. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318185a990 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Kleeff, J., Korc, M., Apte, M., La Vecchia, C., Johnson, C. D., Biankin, A. V., Neale, R. E., Tempero, M., Tuveson, D. A., Hruban, R. H., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.22 · Cited by 1,982
Metadata
- Authors
- Zureikat, A. H., Moser, A. J., Boone, B. A., Bartlett, D. L., Zenati, M., & Zeh, H. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 554-562
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026395193
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 18.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections: Safety and Feasibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a4e87c
- The paper
- Zureikat, A. H., Moser, A. J., Boone, B. A., Bartlett, D. L., Zenati, M., & Zeh, H. J. (2013). 250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections: Safety and Feasibility. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a4e87c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.