The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Quality of Life Outcomes After Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
In Brief Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) compared with open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in patients with early gastric cancer. Summary Background Data: LADG has been beneficial in terms of pain, recovery, and morbidity when compared with open surgery with equal oncologic outcome. There has been no clinical study on QOL. Methods: From July 2003 to November 2005, 164 patients with newly diagnosed cT1N0M0 and cT1N1M0 distal gastric cancer were randomly assigned either to LADG or ODG. All patients were asked to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively on regular follow-up visits. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed with a more favorable outcome noted in the LADG group with respect to intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), total amount of analgesics used (P = 0.019), the size of the wound (P < 0.0001), postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.0001), and QOL parameters of global health (P < 0.0001). Most of the scales on patient functioning including physical (P < 0.0005), role (P = 0.0011), emotional (P < 0.0001), social (P < 0.0001), and symptom scales such as fatigue (P < 0.0001), pain (P < 0.0001), appetite loss (P = 0.031), sleep disturbance (P = 0.003), dysphasia (P = 0.0024), gastro-esophageal reflux (P = 0.0127), dietary restriction (P = 0.0004), anxiety (P = 0.0036), dry mouth (P = 0.0007), and body image (P < 0.0001) were also significantly better in the LADG group compared with the ODG group. Conclusions: Comparison of LADG to ODG in patients with early gastric cancer resulted in improved QOL outcomes in the patients followed for up to 3 months in the LADG group. Although there are randomized prospective studies supporting the use of a laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer, they are primarily focused on oncologic outcome; these prior reports have not addressed postoperative quality of life. We report on the first clinical study comparing the quality of life of patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy with those who have an open gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer
(2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032651 · Cited by 3,395
Lacy, A. M., García-Valdecasas, J. C., Delgado, S., Castells, A., Taurá, P., Piqué, J. M., & Visa, J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09290-5 · Cited by 2,441
Quality of life research within the EORTC—the EORTC QLQ-C30
Fayers, P., & Bottomley, A. (2002) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00448-8 · Cited by 924
Huscher, C. G. S., Mingoli, A., Sgarzini, G., Sansonetti, A., Di Paola, M., Recher, A., & Ponzano, C. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000151892.35922.f2 · Cited by 860
Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth 1 gastrectomy
Kitano, S. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 674
Kitano, S., Shiraishi, N., Fujii, K., Yasuda, K., Inomata, M., & Adachi, Y. (2002) · Surgery · doi:10.1067/msy.2002.120115 · Cited by 604
Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma
German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group, Siewert, J. R., Böttcher, K., Roder, J. D., Busch, R., Hermanek, P., & Meyer, H. J. (1993) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800800829 · Cited by 452
Prognostic relevance of systemic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma
Roukos, D. H., Baltogiannis, G., Cassioumis, D., Siewert, J. R., & Roder, J. D. (1995) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800820954 · Cited by 275
Quality of Life After Laparoscopy-Assisted Billroth I Gastrectomy
Adachi, Y., Suematsu, T., Shiraishi, N., Katsuta, T., Morimoto, A., Kitano, S., & Akazawa, K. (1999) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199901000-00006 · Cited by 261
Cited by
Nam, J. H., Choi, I. J., Cho, S., Kim, C. G., Jun, J. K., Choi, K. S., Nam, B., Lee, J. H., Ryu, K. W., & Kim, Y. (2012) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.27495 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-W., Baik, Y. H., Yun, Y. H., Nam, B. H., Kim, D. H., Choi, I. J., & Bae, J.-M.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 721-727
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982200091
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 25.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Quality of Life Outcomes After Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e318185e62e
- The paper
- Kim, Y.-W., Baik, Y. H., Yun, Y. H., Nam, B. H., Kim, D. H., Choi, I. J., & Bae, J.-M. (2008). Improved Quality of Life Outcomes After Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318185e62e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.