The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma
Abstract
In a prospective multicentre study of 2394 patients with gastric carcinoma the prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection was evaluated. Of 1654 patients undergoing resection, 558 had a standard lymph node dissection, defined as fewer than 26 nodes in the specimen, and 1096 underwent radical lymphadenectomy, i.e. 26 or more nodes in the specimen. Radical dissection signficantly improved the survival rate in patients with Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum (UICC) stages II and IIIA tumours. Multivariate analysis identified radical dissection as an independent prognostic factor in the subgroups of patients with UICC tumour stages II and IIIA. Radical dissection conferred no survival advantage in patients with pN2 tumours. There was no significant difference in morbidity and mortality rates between radical and standard lymph node dissection. Radical lymphadenectomy improves survival in patients with UICC gastric cancer stages II and IIIA, and should be the recommended treatment for such patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
A Confidence Interval for the Median Survival Time
Brookmeyer, R., & Crowley, J. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530286 · Cited by 914
Cited by
Relevant Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer: Ten-Year Results of the German Gastric Cancer Study
Siewert, J. R., Böttcher, K., Stein, H. J., & Roder, J. D. (1998) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199810000-00002 · Cited by 1,083
Self-citationKim, Y.-W., Baik, Y. H., Yun, Y. H., Nam, B. H., Kim, D. H., Choi, I. J., & Bae, J.-M. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318185e62e · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group, Siewert, J. R., Böttcher, K., Roder, J. D., Busch, R., Hermanek, P., & Meyer, H. J.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-08-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1015-1018
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W303784676
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800800829
- The paper
- German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group, Siewert, J. R., Böttcher, K., Roder, J. D., Busch, R., Hermanek, P., & Meyer, H. J. (1993). Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800800829
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.