Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Results of Two-Stage Hepatectomy for Irresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Wicherts, Dennis A., Miller, Rafael, de Haas, Robbert J., Bitsakou, Georgia, Vibert, Eric, Veilhan, Luc-Antoine, Azoulay, Daniel, Bismuth, Henri, Castaing, Denis, Adam, René·2008·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility, risks, and long-term outcome of 2-stage hepatectomy as a means to improve resectability of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Two-stage hepatectomy uses compensatory liver regeneration after a first noncurative hepatectomy to enable a second curative resection. METHODS: Between October 1992 and January 2007, among 262 patients with initially irresectable CLM, 59 patients (23%) were planned for 2-stage hepatectomy. Patients were eligible when single resection could not achieve complete treatment, even in combination with chemotherapy, portal embolization, or radiofrequency, but tumors could be totally removed by 2 sequential resections. Feasibility and outcomes were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Two-stage hepatectomy was feasible in 41 of 59 patients (69%). Eighteen patients failed to complete the second hepatectomy because of disease progression (n = 17) or bad performance status (n = 1). The 41 successfully treated patients had a mean number of 9.1 metastases (mean diameter, 48.5 mm at diagnosis). Chemotherapy was delivered before (95%), in between (78%), and after (78%) the 2 hepatectomies. Mean delay between the 2 liver resections was 4.2 months. Postoperative mortality was 0% and 7% (3/41) after the first and second hepatectomy, respectively. Morbidity rates were also higher after the second procedure (59% vs. 20%) (P < 0.001). Five-year survival was 31% on an intention to treat basis, and all but 2 patients who did not complete the 2-stage strategy died within 19 months. After a median follow-up of 24.4 months (range, 3.7-130.3), overall 3- and 5-year survivals for patients that completed both hepatectomies were 60% and 42%, respectively, after the first hepatectomy (median survival, 42 months from first hepatectomy and 57 months from metastases diagnosis). Disease-free survivals were 26% and 13% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage hepatectomy provides a 5-year survival of 42% and a hope of long-term survival for selected patients with extensive bilobar CLM, irresectable by any other means.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181907fd9

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Wicherts, D. A., Miller, R., de Haas, R. J., Bitsakou, G., Vibert, E., Veilhan, L.-A., Azoulay, D., Bismuth, H., Castaing, D., & Adam, R.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2008-12
Volume
248
Issue
6
Pages
994-1005
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072925972
Cited by
332
References
32
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Results of Two-Stage Hepatectomy for Irresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181907fd9
The paper
Wicherts, D. A., Miller, R., de Haas, R. J., Bitsakou, G., Vibert, E., Veilhan, L.-A., Azoulay, D., Bismuth, H., Castaing, D., & Adam, R. (2008). Long-Term Results of Two-Stage Hepatectomy for Irresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181907fd9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.