Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in Perioperative Outcome After Hepatic Resection: Analysis of 1500 Consecutive Unselected Cases Over 20 Years

Cescon, Matteo, Vetrone, Gaetano, Grazi, Gian Luca, Ramacciato, Giovanni, Ercolani, Giorgio, Ravaioli, Matteo, Del Gaudio, Massimo, Pinna, Antonio Daniele·2009·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To estimate risk factors affecting the early outcome after hepatic resection in a high volume center specialized in hepatobiliary surgery and to analyze the changing of results during 3 different periods of treatment. Design: Retrospective review. Patients: A series of 1500 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection. Methods: Postoperative morbidity and mortality were analyzed in relation to indications for surgery, period of operation, patient characteristics, and intraoperative variables. Patients were classified into 4 groups, according to the indication for surgery: primary liver tumors with cirrhosis (group 1, G1); other liver malignancies (group 2, G2); biliary malignancies (group 3, G3); and benign diseases (group 4, G4). Patients were also divided into 3 groups, according to the year of operation (period 1: June 1985 to October 1993; period 2: November 1993 to September 1999; period 3: October 1999 to September 2007). Results: Overall mortality and morbidity were 3% and 22.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that blood transfusions, G1, and additional procedures were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, whereas blood transfusions, G1, G3, and extended hepatectomy were associated with an increased risk of postoperative mortality. G1 decreased, whereas G3, extended hepatectomies and additional procedures significantly increased between periods 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). The complication rate was significantly lower in period 2 (18.8%) compared with period 1 (23.8%) and period 3 (24.8%). Similarly, there was a significantly lower mortality rate in period 2 (1.6%) compared with period 1 (3.4%) and period 3 (4%). Conclusions: Slightly worse short-term outcomes in liver surgery were observed in recent years, with a concomitant increase of the aggressiveness of operative strategies. Nevertheless, the present results still justify an aggressive approach in liver resections. In a single-center experience of 1500 hepatectomies, the early outcomes were primarily affected by the presence of cirrhosis, biliary malignancies, extended hepatectomies, additional procedures, and intraoperative blood transfusions, with overall morbidity and mortality rates of 22.5% and 3%. These figures were significantly lower in the intermediate than in the more recent period, where more aggressive operative strategies were adopted, but still justified this approach when considering the natural history of neoplastic diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181a63c74

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Cescon, M., Vetrone, G., Grazi, G. L., Ramacciato, G., Ercolani, G., Ravaioli, M., Del Gaudio, M., & Pinna, A. D.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2009-06
Volume
249
Issue
6
Pages
995-1002
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094402021
Cited by
234
References
2
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Perioperative Outcome After Hepatic Resection: Analysis of 1500 Consecutive Unselected Cases Over 20 Years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181a63c74
The paper
Cescon, M., Vetrone, G., Grazi, G. L., Ramacciato, G., Ercolani, G., Ravaioli, M., Del Gaudio, M., & Pinna, A. D. (2009). Trends in Perioperative Outcome After Hepatic Resection: Analysis of 1500 Consecutive Unselected Cases Over 20 Years. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181a63c74

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.