Cited by 142Organ Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisLiver Disease and Transplantation

Posthepatectomy Portal Vein Pressure Predicts Liver Failure and Mortality after Major Liver Resection on Noncirrhotic Liver

Allard, Marc-Antoine, Adam, René, Bucur, Pétru-Octav, Termos, Salah, Cunha, Antonio Sa, Bismuth, Henri, Castaing, Denis, Vibert, Eric·2013·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the predictive value of portal vein pressure (PVP) after major liver resection for posthepatectomy liver failure (PLF) and 90-day mortality in patients without cirrhosis. Background As elevated PVP is associated with liver failure after living donor liver transplantation, we hypothesized that the outcome after major hepatectomy may be influenced by posthepatectomy PVP. Patients and methods All patients without severe fibrosis or cirrhosis who underwent a major liver resection (≥3 segments) with an intraoperative measurement of PVP at the end of the procedure were included. Outcome was analyzed regarding 3 most widely used definitions of PLF: "50-50" criteria, peak of serum bilirubin greater than 120 μmol/L, and grade C PLF proposed by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression model were used to determine the optimal cutoff of PVP and independent risk factors of PLF. Results The study population consisted of 277 patients. Posthepatectomy PVP was gradually correlated with the PLF risk. Probability for PLF was nil when PVP was 10 mm Hg or less, ranges from 13% to 16%, depending on PLF definitions, when PVP was 20 mm Hg, and from 24% to 33% when PVP was 30 mm Hg. The optimal value of posthepatectomy PVP to predict PLF was 22 mm Hg when considering the "50-50" criteria and grade C PLF (proposed by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery). A value of 21 mm Hg best predicted…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a64b38

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study by Allard et al, patients with post-hepatectomy portal pressure > 20 mmHg had a 48% rate of liver failure and 26% mortality, compared to 8% and 2%, respectively, in patients with lower portal pressure.

    “In a study by Allard et al[22], patients with post-hepatectomy portal pressure > 20 mmHg had a 48% rate of liver failure and 26% mortality, compared to just 8% and 2%, respectively, in patients with lower portal pressure.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allard, M.-A., Adam, R., Bucur, P.-O., Termos, S., Cunha, A. S., Bismuth, H., Castaing, D., & Vibert, E.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Allard, Marc-Antoine
  • Adam, René
  • Termos, Salah
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2013-11
Volume
258
Issue
5
Pages
822-830
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970164490
Cited by
142
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
post-hepatectomy liver failure, major hepatectomy, non-cirrhotic liver, 90-day mortality, prognostic factors, portal hypertension, extent of resection, intraoperative blood transfusion, diabetes mellitus, serum bilirubin, liver fibrosis, living donor liver transplantation
MeSH terms
Female, Hepatectomy, Humans, Liver Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, Treatment Outcome, Portal Pressure, Liver Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review