Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 783

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rates and Patterns of Recurrence Following Curative Intent Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of 1669 Patients

Open access
de Jong, Mechteld C., Pulitano, Carlo, Ribero, Dario, Strub, Jennifer, Mentha, Gilles, Schulick, Richard D., Choti, Michael A., Aldrighetti, Luca, Capussotti, Lorenzo, Pawlik, Timothy M.·2009·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective(s): To investigate rates and patterns of recurrence in patients following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis. Background: Outcomes following surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis have largely focused on overall survival. Contemporary data on rates and patterns of recurrence following surgery for colorectal liver metastasis are limited. Methods: One thousand six hundred sixty-nine patients treated with surgery (resection ± radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) for colorectal liver metastasis between 1982 and 2008 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Clinicopathologic data, recurrence patterns, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. Results: At the time of the initial liver-directed surgery, surgical treatment was resection only (90.2%), resection plus RFA (8.0%), or RFA alone (1.8%). While 5-year overall survival was 47.3%, 947 (56.7%) patients recurred with a median RFS time of 16.3 months. First recurrence site was intrahepatic only (43.2%), extrahepatic only (35.8%), intra- and extrahepatic (21.0%). There was no difference in RFS based on site of recurrence (intrahepatic: 16.9 months; extrahepatic: 16.6 months; intra- and extrahepatic: 16.2 month; P > 0.05). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with overall recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56), while history of RFA (HR = 2.39, P = 0.001) and R1 margin status (HR = 1.36) were predictive of intrahepatic recurrence. Pattern of recurrence and RFS remained similar following repeat surgery for recurrent disease. Conclusions: While 5-year survival following surgery for colorectal liver metastasis approaches 50%, over one-half of patients develop recurrence within 2 years. The pattern of failure is distributed relatively equally among intrahepatic, extrahepatic, and intra- plus extrahepatic sites. Patients undergoing repeat surgery for recurrent metastasis have similar patterns of recurrence and RFS time. Patients with colorectal liver metastasis now have much longer overall survival following curative intent surgery. Information on rates and patterns of recurrence is limited. Data from the current study demonstrate that while 5-year survival following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis approaches 50%, over one-half of patients will develop recurrence within 2 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b4539b

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 783

Metadata

Authors
de Jong, M. C., Pulitano, C., Ribero, D., Strub, J., Mentha, G., Schulick, R. D., Choti, M. A., Aldrighetti, L., Capussotti, L., & Pawlik, T. M.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2009-09
Volume
250
Issue
3
Pages
440-448
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970844261
Cited by
783
References
1
FWCI
15.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rates and Patterns of Recurrence Following Curative Intent Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of 1669 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b4539b
The paper
de Jong, M. C., Pulitano, C., Ribero, D., Strub, J., Mentha, G., Schulick, R. D., Choti, M. A., Aldrighetti, L., Capussotti, L., & Pawlik, T. M. (2009). Rates and Patterns of Recurrence Following Curative Intent Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of 1669 Patients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b4539b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.