The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Bacteriology of Pouchitis: A Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis Using 16S rRNA Gene Cloning and Sequencing
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective: To identify, compare, and contrast the microbiota in patients with and without pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Summary Background Data: Pouchitis is the most common complication following RPC. An abnormal host-microbial interaction has been implicated. We investigated the pouch microbiota in patients with and without pouchitis undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for UC and FAP. Methods: Mucosal pouch biopsies, taken from 16 UC (pouchitis 8) and 8 FAP (pouchitis 3) patients were analyzed to the species (or phylotype) level by cloning and sequencing of 3184 full-length bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Results: There was a significant increase in Proteobacteria (P = 0.019) and a significant decrease in Bacteroidetes (P = 0.001) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (P = 0.029) in the total UC compared with the total FAP cohort, but only limited differences were found between the UC nonpouchitis and pouchitis groups and the FAP pouchitis and nonpouchitis groups. Bacterial diversity in the FAP nonpouchitis group was significantly greater than in UC nonpouchitis (P = 0.019) and significantly greater in UC nonpouchitis compared with UC pouchitis (P = 0.009). No individual species or phylotype specifically associated with either UC or FAP pouchitis was found. Conclusions: UC pouch patients have a different, less diverse, gut microbiota than FAP patients. A further reduction in bacterial diversity but no significant dysbiosis occurs in those with pouchitis. The study suggests that a dysbiosis occurs in the ileal pouch of UC RPC patients which predisposes to, but may not directly cause, pouchitis. We investigated the microbiota in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis restorative proctocolectomy patients using 16S rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. We identified significant differences in Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in the total ulcerative colitis compared with the total FAP cohort, but only limited differences between nonpouchitis and pouchitis groups. Supplemental digital content is available in the article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A notable increase in Proteobacteria (E. coli and other enterobacteria), with a marked decrease in Bacteroides and F. prausnitzii, has been described [42] .”
From Intestinal microbiota in health and disease: Role of bifidobacteria in gut homeostasis (2014) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Naive Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M., & Cole, J. R. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00062-07 · Cited by 20,145
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
Diversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora
Eckburg, P. B., Bik, E. M., Bernstein, C. N., Purdom, E., Dethlefsen, L., Sargent, M., Gill, S. R., Nelson, K. E., & Relman, D. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110591 · Cited by 7,913
ARB: a software environment for sequence data
Ludwig, W. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh293 · Cited by 6,714
Frank, D. N., St. Amand, A. L., Feldman, R. A., Boedeker, E. C., Harpaz, N., & Pace, N. R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706625104 · Cited by 4,611
Sokol, H., Pigneur, B., Watterlot, L., Lakhdari, O., Bermúdez-Humarán, L. G., Gratadoux, J.-J., Blugeon, S., Bridonneau, C., Furet, J.-P., Corthier, G., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804812105 · Cited by 4,413
NCBI BLAST: a better web interface
Johnson, M., Zaretskaya, I., Raytselis, Y., Merezhuk, Y., McGinnis, S., & Madden, T. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn201 · Cited by 4,207
Self-citationSchloss, P. D., & Handelsman, J. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.3.1501-1506.2005 · Cited by 2,529
Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut
Hooper, L. V., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058709 · Cited by 2,362
Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn’s disease revealed by a metagenomic approach
Manichanh, C., Rigottier-Gois, L., Bonnaud, E., Gloux, K., Pelletier, E., Frangeul, L., Nalin, R., Jarrin, C., Chardon, P., Marteau, P., et al. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.073817 · Cited by 2,277
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–114 of 114
Guðmundsdóttir, R., Björnsdóttir, S. H., Marteinsson, V., & Pálsson, S. (2020) · Journal of Crustacean Biology · doi:10.1093/jcbiol/ruaa065 · Cited by 1
Management of Acute and Chronic Pouchitis
Li, Y., & Shen, B. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1677-1_34 · Cited by 1
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Chronic Pouchitis: Promising Novel Therapeutic or Lost Cause?
Dalal, R. S., & Allegretti, J. R. (2021) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1093/ibd/izab002 · Cited by 1
Trace aminergic regulation of gastrointestinal inflammation
Gwilt, K. B. (2019) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20317947 · Cited by 1
Microbiology of the Ileoanal Pouch and Managing Pouchitis
McLaughlin, S. D. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94385-5_9
Self-citationInflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathobiology
Shogan, B. D., & Kiran, P. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66049-9_43
Tulchinsky, H. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95591-9_13
Inflammatory Disease of the Ileoanal Pouch – Is It All In The Microbiome?
Segal, J. P. (2022) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb-2022-0024
Shen, B. (2019) · Encyclopedia of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801238-3.66077-4
Aiello, C., Quattrocchi, C., Musumeci, R., Nicolosi, D., Petronio, G. P., & Marco, R. D. (2025) · Microbiology Research · doi:10.3390/microbiolres16020044
Heller Myotomy and Antireflux Techniques
Salvador, R., Costantini, A., Santangelo, M., & Tolone, S. (2025) · Updates in surgery/Updates in surgery series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90570-4_18
Culture et description des bactéries anaérobies strictes du microbiote digestif
Ndongo, S. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/658679f6z2bc1z41daz809czbf77134cd006
Role of Endoscopy to Define Postoperative Recurrence in IBD
Lord, J. D., & Boden, E. K. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11077-6_13
Metadata
- Authors
- McLaughlin, S. D., Walker, A. W., Churcher, C., Clark, S. K., Tekkis, P. P., Johnson, M. W., Parkhill, J., Ciclitira, P. J., Dougan, G., Nicholls, R. J., & Petrovska, L.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- St Mark's Hospital (GB)
- St Mary's Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McLaughlin, Simon D.
- Tekkis, Paris P.
- Nicholls, Ralph John
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 252
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-98
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3292798
- OpenAlex
- W2017185329
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (076964, WT076964)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Microscopic Colitis
- Keywords
- pouchitis, restorative proctocolectomy, ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, dysbiosis, bacterial diversity, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, host-microbe interactions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Base Sequence, Biopsy, Cloning, Molecular, Colitis, Ulcerative, DNA, Bacterial, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Molecular Sequence Data, Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Proctocolectomy, Restorative, Pouchitis, Proteobacteria, Colonic Pouches, Bacteroidetes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
