Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Continuous Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 20-Year Experience

Fan, Sheung Tat, Mau Lo, Chung, Poon, Ronnie T. P., Yeung, Chun, Leung Liu, Chi, Yuen, Wai Key, Ming Lam, Chi, Ng, Kelvin K. C., Ching Chan, See·2011·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the trend of the posthepatectomy survival outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients by analysis of a prospective cohort of 1198 patients over a 20-year period. BACKGROUND: The hospital mortality rate of hepatectomy for HCC has improved but the long-term survival rate remains unsatisfactory. We reported an improvement of survival results 10 years ago. It was not known whether there has been further improvement of results in recent years. METHODS: The patients were categorized into two 10-year periods: period 1, before 1999 (group 1, n = 390) and period 2, after 1999 (group 2, n = 808). Patients in group 2 were managed according to a modified protocol and technique established in previous years. RESULTS: The patients in group 2 were older and had a higher incidence of comorbid illness and cirrhosis. They had a lower hospital mortality rate (3.1% vs 6.2%, P = 0.012) and longer 5-year overall survival (54.8% vs 42.1%, P < 0.001) and disease-free survival rates (34.8% vs 24%, P = 0.0024). An improvement in the overall survival rate was observed in patients with cirrhosis, those undergoing major hepatectomy, and those with tumors of tumor-node-metastasis stages II, IIIA, and IVA. A significant increase in the survival rates was also seen in patients whose tumors were considered transplantable by the Milan criteria (72.5% vs 62.7%, P = 0.0237). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly more favorable patient survival for hepatectomy in period 2. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous improvement of survival outcomes after hepatectomy for HCC was achieved in the past 20 years even in patients with advanced diseases. Hepatectomy remains the treatment of choice for resectable HCC in a predominantly hepatitis B virus-based Asian population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182111195

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Fan, S. T., Mau Lo, C., Poon, R. T. P., Yeung, C., Leung Liu, C., Yuen, W. K., Ming Lam, C., Ng, K. K. C., & Ching Chan, S.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2011-04
Volume
253
Issue
4
Pages
745-758
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015407907
Cited by
341
References
0
FWCI
19.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 20-Year Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182111195
The paper
Fan, S. T., Mau Lo, C., Poon, R. T. P., Yeung, C., Leung Liu, C., Yuen, W. K., Ming Lam, C., Ng, K. K. C., & Ching Chan, S. (2011). Continuous Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 20-Year Experience. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182111195

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.