The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Continuous Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 20-Year Experience
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the trend of the posthepatectomy survival outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients by analysis of a prospective cohort of 1198 patients over a 20-year period. BACKGROUND: The hospital mortality rate of hepatectomy for HCC has improved but the long-term survival rate remains unsatisfactory. We reported an improvement of survival results 10 years ago. It was not known whether there has been further improvement of results in recent years. METHODS: The patients were categorized into two 10-year periods: period 1, before 1999 (group 1, n = 390) and period 2, after 1999 (group 2, n = 808). Patients in group 2 were managed according to a modified protocol and technique established in previous years. RESULTS: The patients in group 2 were older and had a higher incidence of comorbid illness and cirrhosis. They had a lower hospital mortality rate (3.1% vs 6.2%, P = 0.012) and longer 5-year overall survival (54.8% vs 42.1%, P < 0.001) and disease-free survival rates (34.8% vs 24%, P = 0.0024). An improvement in the overall survival rate was observed in patients with cirrhosis, those undergoing major hepatectomy, and those with tumors of tumor-node-metastasis stages II, IIIA, and IVA. A significant increase in the survival rates was also seen in patients whose tumors were considered transplantable by the Milan criteria (72.5% vs 62.7%, P = 0.0237). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly more favorable patient survival for hepatectomy in period 2. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous improvement of survival outcomes after hepatectomy for HCC was achieved in the past 20 years even in patients with advanced diseases. Hepatectomy remains the treatment of choice for resectable HCC in a predominantly hepatitis B virus-based Asian population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ng, K. K. C., Chok, K. S. H., Chan, A. C. Y., Cheung, T. T., Wong, T. C. L., Fung, J. Y. Y., Yuen, J., Poon, R. T. P., Fan, S. T., & Lo, C. M. (2017) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10677 · Cited by 331
Self-citationLi, W., Zhou, X., Huang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Shang, C., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-014-4041-5 · Cited by 46
Cai, Y., Fu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, X., You, P., Li, X., Song, Y., Mu, X., Fang, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-022-04625-y · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, S. T., Mau Lo, C., Poon, R. T. P., Yeung, C., Leung Liu, C., Yuen, W. K., Ming Lam, C., Ng, K. K. C., & Ching Chan, S.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 253
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 745-758
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015407907
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 20-Year Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182111195
- The paper
- Fan, S. T., Mau Lo, C., Poon, R. T. P., Yeung, C., Leung Liu, C., Yuen, W. K., Ming Lam, C., Ng, K. K. C., & Ching Chan, S. (2011). Continuous Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 20-Year Experience. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182111195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.