The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Impact of Complications on Costs of Major Surgical Procedures: A Cost Analysis of 1200 Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of postoperative complications on full in-hospital costs per case. BACKGROUND: Rising expenses for complex medical procedures combined with constrained resources represent a major challenge. The severity of postoperative complications reflects surgical outcomes. The magnitude of the cost created by negative outcomes is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Morbidity of 1200 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery from 2005 to 2008 in a tertiary, high-volume center was assessed by a validated, complication score system. Full in-hospital costs were collected for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using a multivariate linear regression model adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: This study population included 393 complex liver/bile duct surgeries, 110 major pancreas operations, 389 colon resections, and 308 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 1.8%, whereas morbidity was 53.8%. Patients with an uneventful course had mean costs per case of US$ 27,946 (SD US$ 15,106). Costs increased dramatically with the severity of postoperative complications and reached the mean costs of US$ 159,345 (SD US$ 151,191) for grade IV complications. This increase in costs, up to 5 times the cost of a similar operation without complications, was observed for all types of investigated procedures, although the magnitude of the increase varied, with the highest costs in patients undergoing pancreas surgery. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the dramatic impact of postoperative complications on full in-hospital costs per case and that complications are the strongest indicator of costs. Furthermore, the study highlights a relevant savings capacity for major surgical procedures, and supports all efforts to lower negative events in the postoperative course.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward a Consensus on Centralization in Surgery
Vonlanthen, R., Lodge, P., Barkun, J. S., Farges, O., Rogiers, X., Soreide, K., Kehlet, H., Reynolds, J. V., Käser, S. A., Naredi, P., et al. (2018) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002965 · Cited by 274
Self-citationFalz, R., Bischoff, C., Thieme, R., Lässing, J., Mehdorn, M., Stelzner, S., Busse, M., & Gockel, I. (2022) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-022-04088-w · Cited by 104
Mixed-methods analysis of factors impacting use of a postoperative mHealth app
Scott, A. R., Alore, E. A., Naik, A. D., Berger, D. H., & Suliburk, J. W. (2017) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.6728 · Cited by 67
Cos, H., Li, D., Williams, G., Chininis, J., Dai, R., Zhang, J., Srivastava, R., Raper, L., Sanford, D., Hawkins, W., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/23595 · Cited by 63
Leenen, J. P. L., Ardesch, V., Kalkman, C. J., Schoonhoven, L., & Patijn, G. A. (2024) · BJS Open · doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad128 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Vonlanthen, R., Slankamenac, K., Breitenstein, S., Puhan, M. A., Muller, M. K., Hahnloser, D., Hauri, D., Graf, R., & Clavien, P.-A.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 254
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 907-913
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2322630401
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Complications on Costs of Major Surgical Procedures: A Cost Analysis of 1200 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31821d4a43
- The paper
- Vonlanthen, R., Slankamenac, K., Breitenstein, S., Puhan, M. A., Muller, M. K., Hahnloser, D., Hauri, D., Graf, R., & Clavien, P.-A. (2011). The Impact of Complications on Costs of Major Surgical Procedures: A Cost Analysis of 1200 Patients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31821d4a43
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.