The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Surgical Mortality Probability Model: Derivation and Validation of a Simple Risk Prediction Rule for Noncardiac Surgery
Abstract
In Brief Objective: To develop a 30-day mortality risk index for noncardiac surgery that can be used to communicate risk information to patients and guide clinical management at the “point-of-care,” and that can be used by surgeons and hospitals to internally audit their quality of care. Background: Clinicians rely on the Revised Cardiac Risk Index to quantify the risk of cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Because mortality from noncardiac causes accounts for many perioperative deaths, there is also a need for a simple bedside risk index to predict 30-day all-cause mortality after noncardiac surgery. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 298,772 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery during 2005 to 2007 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Results: The 9-point S-MPM (Surgical Mortality Probability Model) 30-day mortality risk index was derived empirically and includes three risk factors: ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status, emergency status, and surgery risk class. Patients with ASA physical status I, II, III, IV or V were assigned either 0, 2, 4, 5, or 6 points, respectively; intermediate- or high-risk procedures were assigned 1 or 2 points, respectively; and emergency procedures were assigned 1 point. Patients with risk scores less than 5 had a predicted risk of mortality less than 0.50%, whereas patients with a risk score of 5 to 6 had a risk of mortality between 1.5% and 4.0%. Patients with a risk score greater than 6 had risk of mortality more than 10%. S-MPM exhibited excellent discrimination (C statistic, 0.897) and acceptable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 13.0, P = 0.023) in the validation data set. Conclusions: Thirty-day mortality after noncardiac surgery can be accurately predicted using a simple and accurate risk score based on information readily available at the bedside. This risk index may play a useful role in facilitating shared decision making, developing and implementing risk-reduction strategies, and guiding quality improvement efforts. Using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we developed a 30-day mortality risk index for noncardiac surgery. The 9-point Surgical Mortality Probability Model (S-MPM) 30-day mortality risk index was derived empirically and includes 3 risk factors: ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status, emergency status, and surgery risk class. Patients with ASA physical status I, II, III, IV, or V were assigned either 0, 2, 4, 5, or 6 points, respectively; intermediate- or high-risk procedures were assigned 1 or 2 points, respectively; and emergency procedures were assigned 1 point. S-MPM exhibited excellent discrimination (C statistic, 0.897) and acceptable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 13.0, P = 0.023) in the validation data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Clinical Prediction Rules: Applications and Methodological Standards
Wasson, J. H., Sox, H. C., Neff, R. K., & Goldman, L. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198509263131306 · Cited by 1,357
Kramer, A. A., & Zimmerman, J. E. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000275267.64078.b0 · Cited by 886
Cited by
Bihorac, A., Ozrazgat-Baslanti, T., Ebadi, A., Motaei, A., Madkour, M., Pardalos, P. M., Lipori, G., Hogan, W. R., Efron, P. A., Moore, F., et al. (2019) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002706 · Cited by 377
Emergency general surgery in the geriatric patient
Desserud, K. F., Veen, T., & Søreide, K. (2016) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10044 · Cited by 176
Ouyang, D., Theurer, J., Stein, N. R., Hughes, J. W., Elias, P., He, B., Yuan, N., Duffy, G., Sandhu, R. K., Ebinger, J., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00220-0 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Glance, L. G., Lustik, S. J., Hannan, E. L., Osler, T. M., Mukamel, D. B., Qian, F., & Dick, A. W.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 255
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 696-702
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166597341
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Surgical Mortality Probability Model: Derivation and Validation of a Simple Risk Prediction Rule for Noncardiac Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31824b45af
- The paper
- Glance, L. G., Lustik, S. J., Hannan, E. L., Osler, T. M., Mukamel, D. B., Qian, F., & Dick, A. W. (2012). The Surgical Mortality Probability Model: Derivation and Validation of a Simple Risk Prediction Rule for Noncardiac Surgery. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31824b45af
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.