The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Timing of Cholecystectomy After Mild Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of recurrent biliary events in the period after mild biliary pancreatitis but before interval cholecystectomy and to determine the safety of cholecystectomy during the index admission. BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines recommend performing cholecystectomy early after mild biliary pancreatitis, consensus on the definition of early (ie, during index admission or within the first weeks after hospital discharge) is lacking. METHODS: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies published from January 1992 to July 2010. Included were cohort studies of patients with mild biliary pancreatitis reporting on the timing of cholecystectomy, number of readmissions for recurrent biliary events before cholecystectomy, operative complications (eg, bile duct injury, bleeding), and mortality. Study quality and risks of bias were assessed. RESULTS: After screening 2413 studies, 8 cohort studies and 1 randomized trial describing 998 patients were included. Cholecystectomy was performed during index admission in 483 patients (48%) without any reported readmissions. Interval cholecystectomy was performed in 515 patients (52%) after 40 days (median; interquartile range: 19-58 days). Before interval cholecystectomy, 95 patients (18%) were readmitted for recurrent biliary events (0% vs 18%, P < 0.0001). These included recurrent biliary pancreatitis (n = 43, 8%), acute cholecystitis (n = 17), and biliary colics (n = 35). Patients who had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had fewer recurrent biliary events (10% vs 24%, P = 0.001), especially less recurrent biliary pancreatitis (1% vs 9%). There were no differences in operative complications, conversion rate (7%), and mortality (0%) between index and interval cholecystectomy. Because baseline characteristics were only reported in 26% of patients, study populations could not be compared. CONCLUSIONS: Interval cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis is associated with a high risk of readmission for recurrent biliary events, especially recurrent biliary pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy during index admission for mild biliary pancreatitis appears safe, but selection bias could not be excluded.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis
Banks, P. A., Freeman, M. L., & the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x · Cited by 2,050
Cited by
Forsmark, C. E., Swaroop Vege, S., & Wilcox, C. M. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1505202 · Cited by 803
ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis
Buxbaum, J. L., Abbas Fehmi, S. M., Sultan, S., Fishman, D. S., Qumseya, B. J., Cortessis, V. K., Schilperoort, H., Kysh, L., Matsuoka, L., Yachimski, P., et al. (2019) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001 · Cited by 667
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones
(2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.005 · Cited by 576
Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis
Greenberg, J. A., Hsu, J., Bawazeer, M., Marshall, J., Friedrich, J. O., Nathens, A., Coburn, N., May, G. R., Pearsall, E., & McLeod, R. S. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1503/cjs.015015 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- van Baal, M. C., Besselink, M. G., Bakker, O. J., van Santvoort, H. C., Schaapherder, A. F., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B., Gooszen, H. G., van Ramshorst, B., & Boerma, D.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 255
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 860-866
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167261714
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing of Cholecystectomy After Mild Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182507646
- The paper
- van Baal, M. C., Besselink, M. G., Bakker, O. J., van Santvoort, H. C., Schaapherder, A. F., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B., Gooszen, H. G., van Ramshorst, B., & Boerma, D. (2012). Timing of Cholecystectomy After Mild Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182507646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.