The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis
Open accessAbstract
Guidelines for appropriate use of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus at the time the guidelines were drafted. Further controlled clinical studies may be needed to clarify aspects of this guideline. This guideline may be revised as necessary to account for changes in technology, new data, or other aspects of clinical practice. The recommendations in this document were based on reviewed studies using the GRADE and systematic review methodologies described in the Methods section. This guideline is intended to be an educational device to provide information that may assist endoscopists in providing care to patients. This guideline is not a rule and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment. Clinical decisions in any particular case involve a complex analysis of the patient’s condition and available courses of action. Therefore, clinical considerations may lead an endoscopist to take a course of action that varies from these guidelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Banks, P. A., Bollen, T. L., Dervenis, C., Gooszen, H. G., Johnson, C. D., Sarr, M. G., Tsiotos, G. G., & Vege, S. S. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779 · Cited by 7,187
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus
Cotton, P. B., Lehman, G., Vennes, J., Geenen, J. E., Russell, R. C. G., Meyers, W. C., Liguory, C., & Nickl, N. (1991) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2 · Cited by 2,841
Complications of Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy
Freeman, M. L., Nelson, D. B., Sherman, S., Haber, G. B., Herman, M. E., Dorsher, P. J., Moore, J. P., Fennerty, M. B., Ryan, M. E., Shaw, M. J., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199609263351301 · Cited by 2,545
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote
Bramer, W. M., Giustini, D., de Jonge, G. B., Holland, L., & Bekhuis, T. (2016) · Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014 · Cited by 2,103 · cited 2×
“False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having [target condition]) 1 (0-4) 6 (2-18) 15 (5-45)”
BackgroundAndrews, J. C., Schünemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Pottie, K., Meerpohl, J. J., Coello, P. A., Rind, D., Montori, V. M., Brito, J. P., Norris, S., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003 · Cited by 1,315
Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies
Andriulli, A., Loperfido, S., Napolitano, G., Niro, G., Valvano, M. R., Spirito, F., Pilotto, A., & Forlano, R. (2007) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x · Cited by 1,199
Burden of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States
Peery, A. F., Crockett, S. D., Barritt, A. S., Dellon, E. S., Eluri, S., Gangarosa, L. M., Jensen, E. T., Lund, J. L., Pasricha, S., Runge, T., et al. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.045 · Cited by 998
Crockett, S. D., Wani, S., Gardner, T. B., Falck-Ytter, Y., Barkun, A. N., Crockett, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Feuerstein, J., Flamm, S., Gellad, Z., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032 · Cited by 945
Self-citationAdverse events associated with ERCP
Chandrasekhara, V., Khashab, M. A., Muthusamy, V. R., Acosta, R. D., Agrawal, D., Bruining, D. H., Eloubeidi, M. A., Fanelli, R. D., Faulx, A. L., Gurudu, S. R., et al. (2017) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051 · Cited by 864
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buxbaum, J. L., Abbas Fehmi, S. M., Sultan, S., Fishman, D. S., Qumseya, B. J., Cortessis, V. K., Schilperoort, H., Kysh, L., Matsuoka, L., Yachimski, P., Agrawal, D., Gurudu, S. R., Jamil, L. H., Jue, T. L., Khashab, M. A., Law, J. K., Lee, J. K., Naveed, M., Sawhney, M. S., Thosani, N., Yang, J., & Wani, S. B.
- Venue
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1075-1105.e15
- ISSN
- 0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2937470841
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 38.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001
- The paper
- Buxbaum, J. L., Abbas Fehmi, S. M., Sultan, S., Fishman, D. S., Qumseya, B. J., Cortessis, V. K., Schilperoort, H., Kysh, L., Matsuoka, L., Yachimski, P., Agrawal, D., Gurudu, S. R., Jamil, L. H., Jue, T. L., Khashab, M. A., Law, J. K., Lee, J. K., Naveed, M., Sawhney, M. S., . . . Wani, S. B. (2019). ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
