Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Excision: The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group

Open access
Park, Jun Seok, Choi, Gyu-Seog, Kim, Seon Hahn, Kim, Hyeong Rok, Kim, Nam Kyu, Lee, Kang Young, Kang, Sung Bum, Kim, Ji Yeon, Lee, Kil Yeon, Kim, Byung Chun, Bae, Byung Noe, Son, Gyung Mo, Lee, Sun Il., Kang, Hyun·2013·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To assess the risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Background: Little data are available about risk factors for AL after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1609 patients with rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer with sphincter preservation. Clinical data related to AL were collected from 11 institutions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for AL. Results: AL was noted in 101 (6.3%) of the patients. The leakage rate ranged from 2.0% to 10.3% for each hospital (P = 0.04). In patients without protective stomas (n = 1187), male sex [hazard ratio (HR), 3.468], advanced tumor stage (HR, 2.520), lower tumor level (HR, 2.418), preoperative chemoradiation (HR, 6.284), perioperative transfusion (HR, 10.705), and multiple firings of the linear stapler (HR, 6.181) were significantly associated with AL. Our theoretical model suggested that the HR for patients with 2 risk factors was significantly higher than that the HR for patients with no or only 1 risk factor. Conclusions: Male sex, low anastomosis, preoperative chemoradiation, advanced tumor stage, perioperative bleeding, and multiple firings of the linear stapler increased the risk of AL after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. A diverting stoma might be mandatory in patients with 2 or more of the risk factors identified in this analysis. Data are lacking regarding the impact of patient and tumor characteristics on anastomotic dehiscence after laparoscopic rectal excision. In this retrospective analysis of multicenter results, male sex, low-lying rectal tumor, preoperative chemoradiation, perioperative bleeding, and multiple firings of the linear stapler increased the anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. A diverting stoma might be mandatory in patients with 2 or more risk factors identified in this analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e31827b8ed9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Park, J. S., Choi, G.-S., Kim, S. H., Kim, H. R., Kim, N. K., Lee, K. Y., Kang, S. B., Kim, J. Y., Lee, K. Y., Kim, B. C., Bae, B. N., Son, G. M., Lee, S. I., & Kang, H.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2013-04
Volume
257
Issue
4
Pages
665-671
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079556948
Cited by
450
References
3
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Excision: The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31827b8ed9
The paper
Park, J. S., Choi, G.-S., Kim, S. H., Kim, H. R., Kim, N. K., Lee, K. Y., Kang, S. B., Kim, J. Y., Lee, K. Y., Kim, B. C., Bae, B. N., Son, G. M., Lee, S. I., & Kang, H. (2013). Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Excision: The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31827b8ed9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.