The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Excision: The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective: To assess the risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Background: Little data are available about risk factors for AL after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1609 patients with rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer with sphincter preservation. Clinical data related to AL were collected from 11 institutions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for AL. Results: AL was noted in 101 (6.3%) of the patients. The leakage rate ranged from 2.0% to 10.3% for each hospital (P = 0.04). In patients without protective stomas (n = 1187), male sex [hazard ratio (HR), 3.468], advanced tumor stage (HR, 2.520), lower tumor level (HR, 2.418), preoperative chemoradiation (HR, 6.284), perioperative transfusion (HR, 10.705), and multiple firings of the linear stapler (HR, 6.181) were significantly associated with AL. Our theoretical model suggested that the HR for patients with 2 risk factors was significantly higher than that the HR for patients with no or only 1 risk factor. Conclusions: Male sex, low anastomosis, preoperative chemoradiation, advanced tumor stage, perioperative bleeding, and multiple firings of the linear stapler increased the risk of AL after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. A diverting stoma might be mandatory in patients with 2 or more of the risk factors identified in this analysis. Data are lacking regarding the impact of patient and tumor characteristics on anastomotic dehiscence after laparoscopic rectal excision. In this retrospective analysis of multicenter results, male sex, low-lying rectal tumor, preoperative chemoradiation, perioperative bleeding, and multiple firings of the linear stapler increased the anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. A diverting stoma might be mandatory in patients with 2 or more risk factors identified in this analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Rutegård, J., Simert, G., & Sjödahl, R. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3180603024 · Cited by 1,123
Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Tan, W. S., Tang, C. L., Shi, L., & Eu, K. W. (2009) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6594 · Cited by 478
Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: The impact of fibrin glue
Huh, J. W., Kim, H. R., & Kim, Y. J. (2010) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.018 · Cited by 114
Self-citation
Cited by
Silva-Velazco, J., Stocchi, L., Costedio, M., Gorgun, E., Kessler, H., & Remzi, F. H. (2016) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4651-6 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J. S., Choi, G.-S., Kim, S. H., Kim, H. R., Kim, N. K., Lee, K. Y., Kang, S. B., Kim, J. Y., Lee, K. Y., Kim, B. C., Bae, B. N., Son, G. M., Lee, S. I., & Kang, H.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 257
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 665-671
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079556948
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Excision: The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31827b8ed9
- The paper
- Park, J. S., Choi, G.-S., Kim, S. H., Kim, H. R., Kim, N. K., Lee, K. Y., Kang, S. B., Kim, J. Y., Lee, K. Y., Kim, B. C., Bae, B. N., Son, G. M., Lee, S. I., & Kang, H. (2013). Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Excision: The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31827b8ed9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.