Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surgery for Gallstone Ileus: A Nationwide Comparison of Trends and Outcomes

Halabi, Wissam J., Kang, Celeste Y., Ketana, Noor, Lafaro, Kelly J., Nguyen, Vinh Q., Stamos, Michael J., Imagawa, David K., Demirjian, Aram N.·2014·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Introduction: Gallstone ileus is a mechanical bowel obstruction caused by a biliary calculus originating from a bilioenteric fistula. Because of the limited number of reported cases, the optimal surgical method of treatment has been the subject of ongoing debate. Methods: A retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2009 was performed for gallstone ileus cases treated surgically by enterotomy with stone extraction alone (ES), enterotomy and cholecystectomy with fistula closure (EF), bowel resection alone (BR), and bowel resection with fistula closure (BF). Patient demographics, hospital factors, comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were reported. Multivariate analysis was performed comparing mortality, morbidity, length of stay, and total cost for the different procedure types. Results: Of the estimated 3,452,536 cases of mechanical bowel obstruction from 2004 to 2009, 3268 (0.095%) were due to gallstone ileus—an incidence lower than previously reported. The majority of patients were elderly women (>70%). ES was the most commonly performed procedure (62% of patients) followed by EF (19% of cases). In 19%, a bowel resection was required. The most common complication was acute renal failure (30.44% of cases). In-hospital mortality was 6.67%. On multivariate analysis, EF and BR were independently associated with higher mortality than ES [(odds ratio [OR] = 2.86; confidence interval [CI]: 1.16–7.07) and (OR = 2.96; CI: 1.26–6.96) respectively]. BR was also associated with a higher complication rate, OR = 1.98 (CI: 1.13–3.46). Conclusions: Gallstone ileus is a rare surgical disease affecting mainly the elderly female population. Mortality rates appear to be lower than previously reported in the literature. Enterotomy with stone extraction alone appears to be associated with better outcomes than more invasive techniques. Gallstone ileus management has been controversial due to the limited number of reported cases. We present a large-scale 6-year retrospective review of the National Inpatient Sample database to better elucidate the incidence of this disease, and the trends of its management and outcomes. Enterotomy with stone extraction alone was independently associated with lower mortality rates than fistula closure or bowel resection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e31827eefed

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Metadata

Authors
Halabi, W. J., Kang, C. Y., Ketana, N., Lafaro, K. J., Nguyen, V. Q., Stamos, M. J., Imagawa, D. K., & Demirjian, A. N.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2014-02
Volume
259
Issue
2
Pages
329-335
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033725781
Cited by
276
References
8
FWCI
12.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgery for Gallstone Ileus: A Nationwide Comparison of Trends and Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31827eefed
The paper
Halabi, W. J., Kang, C. Y., Ketana, N., Lafaro, K. J., Nguyen, V. Q., Stamos, M. J., Imagawa, D. K., & Demirjian, A. N. (2014). Surgery for Gallstone Ileus: A Nationwide Comparison of Trends and Outcomes. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31827eefed

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.