The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Total Laparoscopic Approach Reduces the Infertility Rate After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A 2-Center Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the infertility rate after laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). BACKGROUND: Total proctocolectomy with IPAA is known to be associated with postoperative infertility in open surgery, which may be caused by pelvic adhesions affecting the fallopian tubes. However, fertility after laparoscopic IPAA has never been assessed. METHODS: All patients who underwent a total laparoscopic IPAA between 2000 and 2011 and were aged 45 years or less at the time of operation and 18 years or more at the time of data collection were included. The patients answered a fertility questionnaire by telephone. All demographic and perioperative data were prospectively collected. The results were compared with those of controls undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 31 ± 9 years (range 14-44). IPAA was performed for ulcerative colitis in 73% of the cases and familial adenomatous polyposis in 17%. The mean follow-up after IPAA was 68 ± 33 months (range 6-136). Fifty-six patients answered the questionnaire (89%). Half of them already had a child before IPAA. Fifteen patients attempted pregnancy after IPAA, of which 11 (73%) were able to conceive, resulting in 10 ongoing pregnancies and 1 miscarriage. The global infertility rate was 27%. There was no difference in fertility over time compared with the 14 controls who attempted pregnancy during the same period (90% vs 86% at 36 months, P = 0.397). CONCLUSIONS: The infertility rate appears to be lower after laparoscopic IPAA than after open surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Familial adenomatous polyposis
Galiatsatos, P., & Foulkes, W. D. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00375.x · Cited by 757
Cited by
Lamb, C. A., Kennedy, N. A., Raine, T., Hendy, P. A., Smith, P. J., Limdi, J. K., Hayee, B., Lomer, M. C. E., Parkes, G. C., Selinger, C., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484 · Cited by 2,346
Magro, F., Gionchetti, P., Eliakim, R., Ardizzone, S., Armuzzi, A., Barreiro-de Acosta, M., Burisch, J., Gecse, K. B., Hart, A. L., Hindryckx, P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx008 · Cited by 1,910
European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis
Øresland, T., Bemelman, W. A., Sampietro, G. M., Spinelli, A., Windsor, A., Ferrante, M., Marteau, P., Zmora, O., Kotze, P. G., Espin-Basany, E., et al. (2015) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.012 · Cited by 353
Self-citationRisk of rectal cancer after colectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis: a national cohort study
Abdalla, M., Landerholm, K., Andersson, P., Andersson, R. E., & Myrelid, P. (2017) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.036 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Beyer-Berjot, L., Maggiori, L., Birnbaum, D., Lefevre, J. H., Berdah, S., & Panis, Y.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-282
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330307193
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Total Laparoscopic Approach Reduces the Infertility Rate After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A 2-Center Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182813741
- The paper
- Beyer-Berjot, L., Maggiori, L., Birnbaum, D., Lefevre, J. H., Berdah, S., & Panis, Y. (2013). A Total Laparoscopic Approach Reduces the Infertility Rate After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A 2-Center Study. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182813741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.