Cited by 24Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Age on Postoperative Morbidity in Women Undergoing Urogynecologic Surgery

Bretschneider, C. Emi, Robinson, Barbara, Geller, Elizabeth J., Wu, Jennifer M.·2015·Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to estimate the effect of older age on postoperative morbidity and to assess other factors associated with postoperative complications after urogynecologic surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 508 women who underwent pelvic floor reconstructive surgery between March 2011 and June 2013. Our 2 cohorts were based on age--women younger than 65 years and women aged 65 years or older. Our primary outcome was clinically significant postoperative complications defined as Dindo-Clavien grade greater than or equal to 2. We compared the risk of postoperative morbidity between the cohorts and constructed a logistic regression analysis to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 508 patients, 300 (59.1%) were in the younger cohort and 208 (40.9%) were in the older cohort. For our primary outcome, we found that older women had a significantly higher rate of clinically significant postoperative complications (12.5% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.02). In a multivariate logistic regression model that included advanced prolapse, smoking status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, body mass index, and operative time, older age remained significantly associated with greater postoperative morbidity (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.11). The length of surgery in hours was also associated with greater morbidity (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.66). CONCLUSIONS: Women aged 65 years and older who underwent urogynecologic surgery had a higher risk of clinically significant postoperative complications based on the Dindo-Clavien Scale when compared with women younger than 65 years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/spv.0000000000000150

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • Functional Status and Postoperative Morbidity in Older Women with Prolapse

    Greer, J. A., Northington, G. M., Harvie, H. S., Segal, S., Johnson, J. C., & Arya, L. A. (2013) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.004 · Cited by 33 · cited 1×

    “Prior studies have also suggested that comorbidities, in particular cardiovascular disease and higher ASA scores, are risk factors for surgical morbidity in the urogynecologic patient population.(6) To provide effective perioperative management and counseling, further investigation is needed to delineate the associati…”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Nygaard, 2008, Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women., JAMA, 300, 1311, 10.1001/jama.300.11.1311 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Wu, 2014, Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery., Obstet Gynecol, 123, 1201, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Wu, 2014, Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women., Obstet Gynecol, 123, 141, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057 · DOI
  4. Sung, 2006, Effect of patient age on increasing morbidity and mortality following urogynecologic surgery., Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194, 1411, 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.050 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dindo, 2004, Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey., Ann Surg, 240, 205, 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae · DOI · Paper page
  6. Charlson, 1987, A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation., J Chronic Dis, 40, 373, 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Charlson, 1990, Preoperative characteristics predicting intraoperative hypotension and hypertension among hypertensives and diabetics undergoing noncardiac surgery., Ann Surg, 212, 66, 10.1097/00000658-199007000-00010 · DOI
  8. Hightower, 2010, A pilot study evaluating predictors of postoperative outcomes after major abdominal surgery: physiological capacity compared with the ASA physical status classification system., Br J Anaesth, 104, 465, 10.1093/bja/aeq034 · DOI
  9. McVeigh, 2013, Assessing the impact of an ageing population on complication rates and in-patient length of stay., Int J Surg, 11, 872, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.07.016 · DOI
  10. Stepp, 2005, Incidence of perioperative complications of urogynecologic surgery in elderly women., Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192, 1630, 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.026 · DOI
  11. Robinson, 2013, Robotic versus vaginal urogynecologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study of perioperative complications in elderly women., Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 19, 230, 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318299a66c · DOI
  12. Sze, 2012, A retrospective cohort study of perioperative management on the morbidity of urogynecologic surgery., Int Urogynecol J, 23, 1207, 10.1007/s00192-012-1670-x · DOI
  13. Gerten, 2008, Prolapse and incontinence surgery in older women., J Urol, 179, 2111, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.089 · DOI
  14. de Vries, 2011, Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review., Ageing Res Rev, 10, 104, 10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dronkers, 2010, Preoperative therapeutic programme for elderly patients scheduled for elective abdominal oncological surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study., Clin Rehabil, 24, 614, 10.1177/0269215509358941 · DOI
  16. Hall, 2013, Trends in inpatient hospital deaths: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 2000-2010., NCHS Data Brief, 118, 1
  17. Wilson, 2010, Impaired functional capacity is associated with all-cause mortality after major elective intra-abdominal surgery., Br J Anaesth, 105, 297, 10.1093/bja/aeq128 · DOI
  18. Price, 2008, Type and severity of cognitive decline in older adults after noncardiac surgery., Anesthesiology, 108, 8, 10.1097/01.anes.0000296072.02527.18 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bretschneider, C. E., Robinson, B., Geller, E. J., & Wu, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bretschneider, C. Emi
  • Geller, Elizabeth J.
  • Wu, Jennifer M.
Venue
Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2015-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
236-240
ISSN
2151-8378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320059216
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urogynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Keywords
age, postoperative complications, urogynecologic surgery, pelvic floor reconstruction, older women, operative time, pelvic organ prolapse, smoking, Charlson Comorbidity Index, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Logistic Models, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Operative Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review