Cited by 177Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesUterine Myomas and Treatments

Effect of patient age on increasing morbidity and mortality following urogynecologic surgery

Sung, Vivian W., Weitzen, Sherry, Sokol, Eric R., Rardin, Charles R., Myers, Deborah L.·2006·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of age on the risk of in-hospital mortality and morbidity following urogynecologic surgery and to compare risks associated with obliterative versus reconstructive procedures for prolapse in elderly women.Study design We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from 1998 to 2002 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to obtain odds ratios estimating the effect of age on risk of death and complications, adjusting for comorbidities and demographic factors.Results There were 264,340 women in our study population. Increasing age was associated with higher mortality risks per 1000 women (< 60 years, 0.1; 60-69 years, 0.5; 70-79 years, 0.9; > or = 80 years, 2.8; P < .01) and higher complication risks per 1000 women (< 60 years, 140; 60-69 years, 130; 70-79 years, 160; > or = 80 years, 200; P < .01). Using multivariable logistic regression, increasing age was associated with an increased risk of death (60-69 years, odds ratio [OR] 3.4 [95% CI 1.7-6.9]; 70-79 years, OR 4.9 [95% CI 2.2-10.9]; > or = 80 years, OR 13.6 [95% CI 5.9-31.4]), compared with women < 60 years. The risk of peri-operative complications was also higher in elderly women 80 years of age and older (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3-1.5]) compared with younger women. Elderly women 80 years and over who underwent obliterative procedures had a lower risk of complication compared with those who underwent reconstructive procedures for prolapse (17.0% vs 24.7%, P < .01).Conclusion Although the absolute risk of death is low, elderly women have a higher risk of mortality and morbidity following urogynecologic surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.050

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sung, V. W., Weitzen, S., Sokol, E. R., Rardin, C. R., & Myers, D. L.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
194
Issue
5
Pages
1411-1417
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059926618
Cited by
177
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
patient age, older women, urogynecologic surgery, postoperative mortality, postoperative complications, pelvic organ prolapse, surgical risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Urogenital Surgical Procedures, Uterine Prolapse, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review