CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesHealthcare Quality and ManagementHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Hospitals with higher volumes of emergency general surgery patients achieve lower mortality rates: A case for establishing designated centers for emergency general surgery

Ogola, Gerald O., Haider, Adil, Shafi, Shahid·2017·Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
DOI 10.1097/ta.0000000000001355
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Higher volume has been associated with lower mortality for several surgical diseases. It is not known if this relationship exists in the management of Emergency General Surgery (EGS). Our hypothesis was that EGS patients treated at hospitals with higher EGS volume experienced lower mortality rates than those treated at low-volume hospitals. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 2010 National Inpatient Sample data, maintained by the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research as a representative national sample of inpatients. Patients with EGS diseases were identified using American Association for the Surgery of Trauma definitions using ICD-9 codes (2,640,725 patients from 943 hospitals). Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression model was used to estimate the risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR) for each hospital, adjusted for patient (age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, socioeconomic status, comorbidities) and hospital (region, location, bed size, teaching status, ownership) characteristics. A cubic spline regression model with 4 knots was used to identify the volume associated with low mortality rates. RESULTS: The volume of EGS patients treated was inversely associated with hospital mortality rate. RSMR in hospitals in the highest quintile of volume (median, 7424 patients) was 1.62% (95% CI: 1.61-1.64%); at hospitals in the lowest quintile of volume (median, 68 patients), it was 6.1% (95% CI: 6.0-6.2%) (p < 0.0001). Mortality rate stabilized at an annual volume of 688 (95% CI: 554-753) patients. The mortality rate in hospitals that treated fewer than 688 patients was 5.0% (95% CI: 4.8-5.1%), compared to 1.99% (95% CI: 1.96-2.01%) at those that treated 688 or more patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: EGS patients treated at hospitals with a higher volume of EGS patients experienced lower mortality rates, with a possible threshold of 688 patients per year. A regionalized system of EGS care where complex patients are treated at large-volume centers may improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ta.0000000000001355

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For complex emergency general surgical conditions that pose an immediate threat to life, studies have demonstrated improved outcomes at high-volume, tertiary centers with advanced clinical resources such as immediate operating room capabilities, interventional radiology procedures, and intensive care unit availability.

    “For complex Emergency General Surgical (EGS) conditions that pose an immediate threat to life, studies have demonstrated improved outcomes at high-volume, tertiary centers with advanced clinical resources such as immediate operating room capabilities, interventional radiology procedures, and intensive care unit (ICU) availability.”

    From Racial and ethnic disparities in interhospital transfer for complex emergency general surgical disease across the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Ogola, G. O., Haider, A., & Shafi, S.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2017-03
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
497-504
ISSN
2163-0755 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/ta.0000000000001355
OpenAlex
W2566042161
Cited by
61
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
emergency general surgery, hospital volume, postoperative mortality, low-volume hospitals, trauma care, regionalization of care, volume threshold
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Emergencies, Emergency Medicine, Ethnicity, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, General Surgery, United States, Comorbidity, Hospital Mortality, International Classification of Diseases, Hospitals, High-Volume

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review