Mechanism of penetrating injury mediates the risk of long-term adverse outcomes for survivors of violent trauma
Abstract
Background While hospital-based violence intervention programs are primarily designed to aid youth victims of gun violence at high risk for reinjury, the root causes and complex outcomes of community violence are varied. In this study, we examined the risk factors for violent penetrating injury and how the risk of adverse outcomes for survivors differs by injury type (stabbing vs. gunshot wound). Methods This retrospective study was performed using a cohort of patients presenting to the Boston Medical Center emergency department for a penetrating injury due to community violence between 2006 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the risk of all-cause mortality and violent reinjury within 3 years after surviving a penetrating injury. Results Of the 4,280 survivors of the initial violent penetrating injury, there were 88 deaths (2.1%) and 568 violent reinjuries (13.3%) within 3 years. Compared with gunshot wound victims, stab wound victims were 31% less likely to be reinjured with a gunshot wound (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.93), 72% more likely to be reinjured with a stab wound (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.21-2.43), and 49% more likely to be reinjured by assault (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.14-1.94). While survivors of stabbing and firearm injuries were equally at risk for 3-year all-cause mortality, stab wound victims were 3.75 times more likely to die by a drug/alcohol overdose (HR, 3.75; 95% CI…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among the four studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after five years to 16% after 10 years.
“Among the four studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after five years to 16% after 10 years.18,35,42,44”
From Incidence of and Factors Associated With Recurrent Firearm Injury Among Patients Presenting to St. Louis Trauma Centers, 2010 to 2019 (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
Darke, S., Torok, M., Kaye, S., Ross, J., & McKetin, R. (2010) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02872.x · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mueller, K. L., Cooper, B. P., Moran, V., Lew, D., Ancona, R., Landman, J. M., Spruce, M., Marotta, P., Liss, D. B., Mancini, M. A., et al. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m23-0069 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Among the 4 studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent fi rearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after 5 years to 16% after 10 years (17, 18, 41, 43).”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- Pino, E. C., Fontin, F., James, T. L., & Dugan, E.
- Affiliations
- Boston Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Published
- 2021-07-20
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-519
- ISSN
- 2163-0755 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-0763
- OpenAlex
- W3185501460
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Keywords
- penetrating trauma, community violence, stab wounds, gunshot wounds, all-cause mortality, substance use disorders, violence intervention programs
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Boston, Cause of Death, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Violence, Wounds, Gunshot, Wounds, Stab, Survivors, Risk Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review