Cited by 14Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchCrime Patterns and InterventionsTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Mechanism of penetrating injury mediates the risk of long-term adverse outcomes for survivors of violent trauma

Pino, Elizabeth C., Fontin, Francesca, James, Thea L., Dugan, Elizabeth·2022·Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

Abstract

Background While hospital-based violence intervention programs are primarily designed to aid youth victims of gun violence at high risk for reinjury, the root causes and complex outcomes of community violence are varied. In this study, we examined the risk factors for violent penetrating injury and how the risk of adverse outcomes for survivors differs by injury type (stabbing vs. gunshot wound). Methods This retrospective study was performed using a cohort of patients presenting to the Boston Medical Center emergency department for a penetrating injury due to community violence between 2006 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the risk of all-cause mortality and violent reinjury within 3 years after surviving a penetrating injury. Results Of the 4,280 survivors of the initial violent penetrating injury, there were 88 deaths (2.1%) and 568 violent reinjuries (13.3%) within 3 years. Compared with gunshot wound victims, stab wound victims were 31% less likely to be reinjured with a gunshot wound (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.93), 72% more likely to be reinjured with a stab wound (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.21-2.43), and 49% more likely to be reinjured by assault (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.14-1.94). While survivors of stabbing and firearm injuries were equally at risk for 3-year all-cause mortality, stab wound victims were 3.75 times more likely to die by a drug/alcohol overdose (HR, 3.75; 95% CI…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ta.0000000000003364

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pino, E. C., Fontin, F., James, T. L., & Dugan, E.
Affiliations
Boston Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Published
2021-07-20
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
511-519
ISSN
  • 2163-0755 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-0763
OpenAlex
W3185501460
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
penetrating trauma, community violence, stab wounds, gunshot wounds, all-cause mortality, substance use disorders, violence intervention programs
MeSH terms
Adult, Boston, Cause of Death, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Violence, Wounds, Gunshot, Wounds, Stab, Survivors, Risk Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review