The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Predictive Model for Massive Transfusion in Combat Casualty Patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion (MT) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in severely injured patients. Early and aggressive use of blood products in these patients may correct coagulopathy, control bleeding, and improve outcomes. However, rapid identification of patients at risk for MT has been difficult. We postulated that evaluation of clinical variables routinely assessed upon admission would allow identification of these patients for earlier, more effective intervention. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single combat support hospital to identify risk factors for MT in patients with traumatic injuries. Demographic, diagnostic, and laboratory variables obtained upon admission were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. An algorithm was formulated, validated with an independent dataset and a simple scoring system was devised. RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred forty-two patient records were reviewed. At least one unit of blood was transfused to 680 patients at the combat support hospital. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, transfer from another medical facility, designation as a security internee, or incomplete data fields. The final number of patients was 302, of whom 26.5% (80 of 302) received a MT. Patients with MT had higher mortality (29 vs. 7% [p < 0.001]), and an increased Injury Severity Score (25 +/- 11.1 vs. 18 +/- 16.2 [p < 0.001]). Four independent risk factors for MT were identified: heart rate >105 bpm, systolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg, pH <7.25, and hematocrit <32.0%. An algorithm was created to analyze the risk of MT (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.839). In an independent data set of 396 patients the ability to accurately identify those requiring MT was 66% (AUC = 0.747). CONCLUSIONS: Independent predictors for MT were identified in a cohort of severely injured patients requiring transfusions. Patients requiring a MT can be identified with variables commonly obtained upon hospital admission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Holcomb, J. B., del Junco, D. J., Fox, E. E., Wade, C. E., Cohen, M. J., Schreiber, M. A., Alarcon, L. H., Bai, Y., Brasel, K. J., Bulger, E. M., et al. (2013) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/2013.jamasurg.387 · Cited by 1,107
Self-citationResuscitation and transfusion principles for traumatic hemorrhagic shock
Spinella, P. C., & Holcomb, J. B. (2009) · Blood Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.blre.2009.07.003 · Cited by 368
Self-citationFIBTEM provides early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma
Schöchl, H., Cotton, B., Inaba, K., Nienaber, U., Fischer, H., Voelckel, W., & Solomon, C. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc10539 · Cited by 313
McGirt, M. J., Bydon, M., Archer, K. R., Devin, C. J., Chotai, S., Parker, S. L., Nian, H., Harrell, F. E., Speroff, T., Dittus, R. S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine · doi:10.3171/2016.11.spine16526 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- McLaughlin, D. F., Niles, S. E., Salinas, J., Perkins, J. G., Cox, E. D., Wade, C. E., & Holcomb, J. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- S57-S63
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015068956
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Predictive Model for Massive Transfusion in Combat Casualty Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ta.0b013e318160a566
- The paper
- McLaughlin, D. F., Niles, S. E., Salinas, J., Perkins, J. G., Cox, E. D., Wade, C. E., & Holcomb, J. B. (2008). A Predictive Model for Massive Transfusion in Combat Casualty Patients. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e318160a566
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.