The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combat Wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There have been no large cohort reports detailing the wounding patterns and mechanisms in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: The Joint Theater Trauma Registry was queried for all US service members receiving treatment for wounds (International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev. codes 800-960) sustained in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom from October 2001 through January 2005. Returned-to-duty and nonbattle injuries were excluded from final analysis. RESULTS: This query resulted in 3,102 casualties, of which 31% were classified as nonbattle injuries and 18% were returned-to-duty within 72 hours. A total of 1,566 combatants sustained 6,609 combat wounds. The locations of these wounds were as follows: head (8%), eyes (6%), ears (3%), face (10%), neck (3%), thorax (6%), abdomen (11%), and extremity (54%). The proportion of head and neck wounds is higher (p < 0.0001) than the proportion experienced in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam wars (16%-21%). The proportion of thoracic wounds is a decrease (p < 0.0001) from World War II and Vietnam (13%). The proportion of gunshot wounds was 18%, whereas the proportion sustained from explosions was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: The wounding patterns currently seen in Iraq and Afghanistan resemble the patterns from previous conflicts, with some notable exceptions: a greater proportion of head and neck wounds, and a lower proportion of thoracic wounds. An explosive mechanism accounted for 78% of injuries, which is the highest proportion seen in any large-scale conflict.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Adelson, P. D., Andelic, N., Bell, M. J., Belli, A., Bragge, P., Brazinova, A., Büki, A., Chesnut, R. M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30371-x · Cited by 2,609
Grogan, B. F., & Hsu, J. R. (2011) · American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon · doi:10.5435/00124635-201102001-00007 · Cited by 402
Brenner, L. A., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Terrio, H. (2009) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016908 · Cited by 196
Repetitive blast exposure in mice and combat veterans causes persistent cerebellar dysfunction
Meabon, J. S., Huber, B. R., Cross, D. J., Richards, T. L., Minoshima, S., Pagulayan, K. F., Li, G., Meeker, K. D., Kraemer, B. C., Petrie, E. C., et al. (2016) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9585 · Cited by 138
Swanson, T. M., Isaacson, B. M., Cyborski, C. M., French, L. M., Tsao, J. W., & Pasquina, P. F. (2017) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1177/0033354916687748 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Owens, B. D., Kragh, J. F., Wenke, J. C., Macaitis, J., Wade, C. E., & Holcomb, J. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-299
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982571807
- Cited by
- 1,107
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 68.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combat Wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ta.0b013e318163b875
- The paper
- Owens, B. D., Kragh, J. F., Wenke, J. C., Macaitis, J., Wade, C. E., & Holcomb, J. B. (2008). Combat Wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e318163b875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.