A Nationwide Review of the Associations Among Cervical Spine Injuries, Head Injuries, and Facial Fractures
Abstract
Background : Several small studies have investigated the relationship among facial fractures, c-spine injuries, and head injuries with varying results. Determining this correlation at a national level would be the first step in updating the trauma imaging protocol. The purpose of this study was to review the incidence of facial fractures, c-spine injuries, and head injuries at trauma centers across the United States. Methods : The design was a retrospective chart review of International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, diagnosis and procedure codes from the National Trauma Data Bank between the years 2002 and 2006. This included data on more than 2.7 million reported traumas. Results : The incidence of facial fracture was 13.5% in patients with a c-spine injury, 21.7% in patients with a head injury, and 24.0% of patients with a combined c-spine and head trauma. Head injuries were found in 40.2% of patients with a c-spine injury, 67.9% of patients with a facial fracture, and 71.5% of patients with a combined c-spine injury and facial fracture. C-spine injuries were reported in 6.7% of facial fractures, 7.0% of head injuries, and 7.8% of patients with a combined facial fracture and head injury. Conclusions : This is the largest review in history documenting these associations. Pending cost-benefit analysis, the current trauma imaging protocol may be challenged.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The incidence of c-spine injuries is 6%-8% in patients with head and facial trauma.
“and 6%-8% in patients with head and facial trauma)”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [30]
The incidence of c-spine injuries is approximately 2% in the general trauma population.
“the incidence of c-spine injuries is relatively low (occurring in approximately 2% in the general trauma population”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mulligan, R. P., Friedman, J. A., & Mahabir, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
- ORCID
- Mahabir, Raman Chaos
- Venue
- Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 587-592
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023273984
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
- Keywords
- cervical spine injury, traumatic brain injury, facial fractures, injury incidence, National Trauma Data Bank
- MeSH terms
- Cervical Vertebrae, Facial Bones, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Injuries, Trauma Centers, Incidence, Databases, Factual, International Classification of Diseases, Fractures, Bone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review