Cited by 102Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFacial Trauma and Fracture Management

A Nationwide Review of the Associations Among Cervical Spine Injuries, Head Injuries, and Facial Fractures

Mulligan, Ryan Patrick, Friedman, Jonathan A., Mahabir, Raman Chaos·2010·Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care

Abstract

Background : Several small studies have investigated the relationship among facial fractures, c-spine injuries, and head injuries with varying results. Determining this correlation at a national level would be the first step in updating the trauma imaging protocol. The purpose of this study was to review the incidence of facial fractures, c-spine injuries, and head injuries at trauma centers across the United States. Methods : The design was a retrospective chart review of International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, diagnosis and procedure codes from the National Trauma Data Bank between the years 2002 and 2006. This included data on more than 2.7 million reported traumas. Results : The incidence of facial fracture was 13.5% in patients with a c-spine injury, 21.7% in patients with a head injury, and 24.0% of patients with a combined c-spine and head trauma. Head injuries were found in 40.2% of patients with a c-spine injury, 67.9% of patients with a facial fracture, and 71.5% of patients with a combined c-spine injury and facial fracture. C-spine injuries were reported in 6.7% of facial fractures, 7.0% of head injuries, and 7.8% of patients with a combined facial fracture and head injury. Conclusions : This is the largest review in history documenting these associations. Pending cost-benefit analysis, the current trauma imaging protocol may be challenged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181b16bc5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The incidence of c-spine injuries is 6%-8% in patients with head and facial trauma.

    “and 6%-8% in patients with head and facial trauma)”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [30]

  • The incidence of c-spine injuries is approximately 2% in the general trauma population.

    “the incidence of c-spine injuries is relatively low (occurring in approximately 2% in the general trauma population”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [30]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulligan, R. P., Friedman, J. A., & Mahabir, R. C.
Affiliations
Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
Published
2010-03
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
587-592
ISSN
0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023273984
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Keywords
cervical spine injury, traumatic brain injury, facial fractures, injury incidence, National Trauma Data Bank
MeSH terms
Cervical Vertebrae, Facial Bones, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Injuries, Trauma Centers, Incidence, Databases, Factual, International Classification of Diseases, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review