Environmental Language Factors in Theory of Mind Development: Evidence From Children Who Are Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing or Who Have Specific Language Impairment
Abstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) is a foundational skill related to understanding the thoughts, beliefs, and desires of oneself and others. There are child factors that play an important role in the development of ToM (e.g., language and vocabulary) as well as environmental factors (e.g., conversations among family members and socioeconomic status). In this review, we discuss the role of language in ToM and include the nature of social interactions that scaffold ToM development. We review research on deaf and hard-of-hearing children and children with specific language impairment; 2 groups who experience difficulties with language for different reasons, but both encounter deficits in ToM development. Finally, we conclude with examples of how clinicians can easily assess a child's ToM abilities and offer empirical evidence that aspects of ToM can be scaffolded with explicit instruction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher order cognitive and affective theory of mind typically develops between ages eight and 12.
“Higher order cognitive and affective (feeling) ToM which typically develop between ages eight and 12 are things like being able to recognize”
From Differences of Mean Scores on the Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) for Classical Christian Schools Compared to Non-Classical Christian Schools (2019) · cites this paper as Stanzione & Schick, 2014
Cites
Hoff, E. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00612 · Cited by 2,346 · see citing works
How social contexts support and shape language development☆
HOFF, E. (2006) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002 · Cited by 1,853 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…show lower levels of oral language skills, including vocabulary and language comprehension and production (Bornstein & Bradley, 2003; Bradley & Crowyn, 2002; Fernald, Marchman, & Weisleder, 2012; Hart & Risley, 1995; Hoff, 2003, 2006; Huttenlocher, Waterfall, Vasilyeva, Vevea, & Hedges, 2010).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vaughan, C. A. (2019) · Journal of Research on Christian Education · doi:10.1080/10656219.2019.1704326 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stanzione, C., & Schick, B.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Topics in Language Disorders
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 296-312
- ISSN
- 0271-8294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315118994
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Topics in Language Disorders (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- theory of mind, language development, environmental factors, social interaction, scaffolding, deaf and hard of hearing children, specific language impairment, socioeconomic status, family conversation, explicit instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review