Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Hangzhou Experiences [RETRACTED]

Zheng, Shu-Sen, Xu, Xiao, Wu, Jian, Chen, Jun, Wang, Wei-Lin, Zhang, Min, Liang, Ting-Bo, Wu, Li-Ming·2008·Transplantation

Abstract

Introduction.: Liver transplantation (LT) has been the treatment of choice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study was designed to summarize our experience in LT for HCC patients and establish a new set of criteria for patient selection and prognosis prediction. Materials and Methods.: Data of 195 patients with HCC were retrospectively analyzed and various clinical and pathological factors for survival and tumor-free survival were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results.: Macrovascular invasion, preoperative serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level, tumor size, multifocality, histopathologic grading, distribution, and cirrhosis background were significant factors for survival and tumor-free survival by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified macrovascular invasion, tumor size, preoperative AFP level, and histopathologic grading were prognostic factors independently associated with patient survival or tumor-free survival (RR=1.688-2.779, P =0.000-0.034). Based on the prognostic stratification of different risk groups of patients without macrovascular invasion, Hangzhou criteria was established, containing one of the two following items: (a) Total tumor diameter less than or equal to 8 cm; (b) total tumor diameter more than 8 cm, with histopathologic grade I or II and preoperative AFP level less than or equal to 400 ng/mL, simultaneously. The difference between survival curves of patients fulfilling Milan criteria (n=72) and patients fulfilling Hangzhou criteria (n=99) did not achieve statistical significance (5-year survival rates: 78.3% vs. 72.3%, P >0.05). Of the patients exceeding Milan criteria (n=123), those who fulfilled Hangzhou criteria (n=26) also had better prognosis than the others (n=97) ( P =0.000). Conclusion.: The results of this study show a reliable and feasible candidates selection and prognostic criteria of LT in HCC patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/tp.0b013e31816b67e4This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, S.-S., Xu, X., Wu, J., Chen, J., Wang, W.-L., Zhang, M., Liang, T.-B., & Wu, L.-M.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
2008-06-27
Volume
85
Issue
12
Pages
1726-1732
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002998858
Cited by
452
References
0
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Hangzhou Experiences [RETRACTED]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/tp.0b013e31816b67e4
The paper
Zheng, S.-S., Xu, X., Wu, J., Chen, J., Wang, W.-L., Zhang, M., Liang, T.-B., & Wu, L.-M. (2008). Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Hangzhou Experiences [RETRACTED]. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0b013e31816b67e4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.