The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus Guidelines on the Testing and Clinical Management Issues Associated With HLA and Non-HLA Antibodies in Transplantation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) technology for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in transplantation while providing greater sensitivity than was obtainable by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assays has resulted in a new paradigm with respect to the interpretation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Although the SPI assay performed on the Luminex instrument (hereafter referred to as the Luminex assay), in particular, has permitted the detection of antibodies not detectable by CDC, the clinical significance of these antibodies is incompletely understood. Nevertheless, the detection of these antibodies has led to changes in the clinical management of sensitized patients. In addition, SPI testing raises technical issues that require resolution and careful consideration when interpreting antibody results. METHODS: With this background, The Transplantation Society convened a group of laboratory and clinical experts in the field of transplantation to prepare a consensus report and make recommendations on the use of this new technology based on both published evidence and expert opinion. Three working groups were formed to address (a) the technical issues with respect to the use of this technology, (b) the interpretation of pretransplantation antibody testing in the context of various clinical settings and organ transplant types (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestinal, and islet cells), and (c) the application of antibody testing in the posttransplantation setting. The three groups were established in November 2011 and convened for a "Consensus Conference on Antibodies in Transplantation" in Rome, Italy, in May 2012. The deliberations of the three groups meeting independently and then together are the bases for this report. RESULTS: A comprehensive list of recommendations was prepared by each group. A summary of the key recommendations follows. Technical Group: (a) SPI must be used for the detection of pretransplantation HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant recipients and, in particular, the use of the single-antigen bead assay to detect antibodies to HLA loci, such as Cw, DQA, DPA, and DPB, which are not readily detected by other methods. (b) The use of SPI for antibody detection should be supplemented with cell-based assays to examine the correlations between the two types of assays and to establish the likelihood of a positive crossmatch (XM). (c) There must be an awareness of the technical factors that can influence the results and their clinical interpretation when using the Luminex bead technology, such as variation in antigen density and the presence of denatured antigen on the beads. Pretransplantation Group: (a) Risk categories should be established based on the antibody and the XM results obtained. (b) DSA detected by CDC and a positive XM should be avoided due to their strong association with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. (c) A renal transplantation can be performed in the absence of a prospective XM if single-antigen bead screening for antibodies to all class I and II HLA loci is negative. This decision, however, needs to be taken in agreement with local clinical programs and the relevant regulatory bodies. (d) The presence of DSA HLA antibodies should be avoided in heart and lung transplantation and considered a risk factor for liver, intestinal, and islet cell transplantation. Posttransplantation Group: (a) High-risk patients (i.e., desensitized or DSA positive/XM negative) should be monitored by measurement of DSA and protocol biopsies in the first 3 months after transplantation. (b) Intermediate-risk patients (history of DSA but currently negative) should be monitored for DSA within the first month. If DSA is present, a biopsy should be performed. (c) Low-risk patients (nonsensitized first transplantation) should be screened for DSA at least once 3 to 12 months after transplantation. If DSA is detected, a biopsy should be performed. In all three categories, the recommendations for subsequent treatment are based on the biopsy results. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive list of recommendations is provided covering the technical and pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. The recommendations are intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance in the use and clinical application of recently developed methods for HLA antibody detection when used in conjunction with traditional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microdroplet Assay of Human Serum Cytotoxins
TERASAKI, P. I., & McCLELLAND, J. D. (1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/204998b0 · Cited by 2,060
Sellarés, J., de Freitas, D. G., Mengel, M., Reeve, J., Einecke, G., Sis, B., Hidalgo, L. G., Famulski, K., Matas, A., & Halloran, P. F. (2012) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x · Cited by 1,590
Significance of the Positive Crossmatch Test in Kidney Transplantation
Patel, R., & Terasaki, P. I. (1969) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196904032801401 · Cited by 1,508
Solez, K., Colvin, R., Racusen, L., Sis, B., Halloran, P., Birk, P., Campbell, P., Cascalho, M., Collins, A., Demetris, A., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01688.x · Cited by 1,082
Self-citationRacusen, L. C., Colvin, R. B., Solez, K., Mihatsch, M. J., Halloran, P. F., Campbell, P. M., Cecka, M. J., Cosyns, J., Demetris, A. J., Fishbein, M. C., et al. (2003) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00072.x · Cited by 1,060
Self-citationWiebe, C., Gibson, I. W., Blydt-Hansen, T. D., Karpinski, M., Ho, J., Storsley, L. J., Goldberg, A., Birk, P. E., Rush, D. N., & Nickerson, P. W. (2012) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04013.x · Cited by 950
Self-citationAngiotensin II Type 1–Receptor Activating Antibodies in Renal-Allograft Rejection
Dragun, D., Müller, D. N., Bräsen, J. H., Fritsche, L., Nieminen-Kelhä, M., Dechend, R., Kintscher, U., Rudolph, B., Hoebeke, J., Eckert, D., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa035717 · Cited by 868
Identifying Specific Causes of Kidney Allograft Loss
El-Zoghby, Z. M., Stegall, M. D., Lager, D. J., Kremers, W. K., Amer, H., Gloor, J. M., & Cosio, F. G. (2009) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02519.x · Cited by 801
Preexisting Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Predict Outcome in Kidney Transplantation
Lefaucheur, C., Loupy, A., Hill, G. S., Andrade, J., Nochy, D., Antoine, C., Gautreau, C., Charron, D., Glotz, D., & Suberbielle-Boissel, C. (2010) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2009101065 · Cited by 789
Self-citationDesensitization in HLA-Incompatible Kidney Recipients and Survival
Montgomery, R. A., Lonze, B. E., King, K. E., Kraus, E. S., Kucirka, L. M., Locke, J. E., Warren, D. S., Simpkins, C. E., Dagher, N. N., Singer, A. L., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1012376 · Cited by 687
Self-citation
Cited by
A 2018 Reference Guide to the Banff Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology
Roufosse, C., Simmonds, N., Clahsen-van Groningen, M., Haas, M., Henriksen, K. J., Horsfield, C., Loupy, A., Mengel, M., Perkowska-Ptasińska, A., Rabant, M., et al. (2018) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000002366 · Cited by 751
Baker, R. J., Mark, P. B., Patel, R. K., Stevens, K. K., & Palmer, N. (2017) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0553-2 · Cited by 211
Survival in Sensitized Lung Transplant Recipients With Perioperative Desensitization
Tinckam, K. J., Keshavjee, S., Chaparro, C., Barth, D., Azad, S., Binnie, M., Chow, C. W., de Perrot, M., Pierre, A. F., Waddell, T. K., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.13076 · Cited by 161
Clinical outcomes of lung transplantation in the presence of donor-specific antibodies
Courtwright, A. M., Cao, S., Wood, I., Mallidi, H. R., Kawasawa, J., Moniodis, A., Ng, J., El-Chemaly, S., & Goldberg, H. J. (2019) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.201812-869oc · Cited by 39
Muduma, G., Odeyemi, I., Smith-Palmer, J., & Pollock, R. F. (2016) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0292-y · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Tait, B. D., Süsal, C., Gebel, H. M., Nickerson, P. W., Zachary, A. A., Claas, F. H. J., Reed, E. F., Bray, R. A., Campbell, P., Chapman, J. R., Coates, P. T., Colvin, R. B., Cozzi, E., Doxiadis, I. I. N., Fuggle, S. V., Gill, J., Glotz, D., Lachmann, N., Mohanakumar, T., Suciu-Foca, N., Sumitran-Holgersson, S., Tanabe, K., Taylor, C. J., Tyan, D. B., Webster, A., Zeevi, A., & Opelz, G.
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2013-01-15
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-47
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047292563
- Cited by
- 787
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 43.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Guidelines on the Testing and Clinical Management Issues Associated With HLA and Non-HLA Antibodies in Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/tp.0b013e31827a19cc
- The paper
- Tait, B. D., Süsal, C., Gebel, H. M., Nickerson, P. W., Zachary, A. A., Claas, F. H. J., Reed, E. F., Bray, R. A., Campbell, P., Chapman, J. R., Coates, P. T., Colvin, R. B., Cozzi, E., Doxiadis, I. I. N., Fuggle, S. V., Gill, J., Glotz, D., Lachmann, N., Mohanakumar, T., . . . Opelz, G. (2013). Consensus Guidelines on the Testing and Clinical Management Issues Associated With HLA and Non-HLA Antibodies in Transplantation. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0b013e31827a19cc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.