Cited by 55Diabetes Treatment and ManagementTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in the management of diabetes mellitus in heart transplant recipients

Open access
Cehic, Matthew G., Muir, Christopher A., Greenfield, Jerry R., Hayward, Christopher, Jabbour, Andrew, Keogh, Anne, Kotlyar, Eugene, Muthiah, Kavitha +1 more·2019·Transplantation Direct

Abstract

Background.: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is prevalent in patients undergoing heart transplant, and in those without preexisting T2DM, posttransplant diabetes mellitus may develop. Both T2DM and posttransplant diabetes mellitus have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality following heart transplantation. Empagliflozin is an effective glucose-lowering therapy that reduces the incidence of major cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM. The safety and efficacy of empagliflozin in transplant patients with diabetes mellitus has yet to be established. Methods.: Clinical outcomes were retrospectively examined in 22 heart transplant recipients treated with empagliflozin and compared with those of 79 heart transplant patients with diabetes mellitus receiving alternative glucose-lowering therapies. Results.: Three adverse events were recorded in empagliflozin-treated patients, leading to treatment discontinuation in 1. There were no genitourinary infections. Treatment with empagliflozin for 12 months was associated with reductions in weight, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, and frusemide dose that were not seen in the control group. There were no large changes observed in blood pressure (systolic or diastolic) or renal function (serum urea, creatinine, or estimated glomerular filtration rate) after 12 months of treatment with empagliflozin or alternative glucose-lowering therapies. Conclusions.: Empagliflozin appears safe and effective in the management of selected patients with diabetes mellitus following heart transplantation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/txd.0000000000000885

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For T2D and posttransplant diabetes, it is reasonable to treat kidney transplant recipients with metformin according to eGFR, as for the broader population with T2D, because risks of metformin are related to kidney function.

    “For T2D and posttransplant diabetes, it is reasonable to treat kidney transplant recipients with metformin according to eGFR, as for the broader population with T2D, because risks of metformin are related to kidney function (80–84).”

    From Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Results and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) mention metformin use among heart transplant recipients, but do not address metformin treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Searches for metformin with eGFR, renal function, and contraindications found no guidance on eGFR-based metformin use or evidence that its risks depend on kidney function. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cehic, M. G., Muir, C. A., Greenfield, J. R., Hayward, C., Jabbour, A., Keogh, A., Kotlyar, E., Muthiah, K., & Macdonald, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute (AU)
  • Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Corresponding author
Macdonald, Peter S.
Venue
Transplantation Direct
Published
2019-05
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e450
ISSN
2373-8731 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940695156
Cited by
55
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transplantation Direct (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
empagliflozin, heart transplantation, type 2 diabetes, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, SGLT2 inhibitors, glucose-lowering therapy, HbA1c, weight loss, renal function, drug safety, adverse events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review