Cited by 38Mitochondrial Function and PathologyGlaucoma and retinal disordersNeuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemia

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment strategies for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy

Open access
Jurkute, Neringa, Harvey, Joshua, Yu-Wai-Man, Patrick·2019·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

Purpose of review: Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is the most common primary mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disorder in the population and it carries a poor visual prognosis. In this article, we review the development of treatment strategies for LHON, the evidence base and the areas of unmet clinical need. Recent findings: There is accumulating evidence that increasing mitochondrial biogenesis could be an effective strategy for protecting retinal ganglion cells in LHON. A number of clinical trials are currently investigating the efficacy of viral-based gene therapy for patients harbouring the m.11778G>A mtDNA mutation. For female LHON carriers of childbearing age, mitochondrial replacement therapy is being offered to prevent the maternal transmission of pathogenic mtDNA mutations. Summary: Although disease-modifying treatment options remain limited, a better understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms in LHON is paving the way for complementary neuroprotective and gene therapeutic strategies for this mitochondrial optic nerve disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0000000000000646

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 50 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Jurkute, N., Harvey, J., & Yu-Wai-Man, P.
Affiliations
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  • NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2019-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
99-104
ISSN
  • 1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6551
OpenAlex
W2905060112
Cited by
38
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemia
Keywords
Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy, mitochondrial DNA mutations, m.11778G>A mutation, mitochondrial biogenesis, gene therapy, mitochondrial replacement therapy, neuroprotection, disease-modifying therapy
MeSH terms
DNA, Mitochondrial, Humans, Mutation, Genetic Therapy, Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review